Ororaro
Well-known
Ah, it was satire 🙄
I'd venture that most people wouldn't be able to tell which lens it was even from a large print.
Sooo true!
Ah, it was satire 🙄
I'd venture that most people wouldn't be able to tell which lens it was even from a large print.
However, that is a great baby, did it come with a commemorative box?
Thanks!
It came wrapped in a towel. I then deposited it in a box for a few hours... Not a commemorative one, unfortunately. Is the baby still worth something?
Mutual distrust and lack of admiration is a great thing. Far better than mutual fawning and back scratching.
Thanks!
It came wrapped in a towel. I then deposited it in a box for a few hours... Not a commemorative one, unfortunately. Is the baby still worth something?
There is enough information in there to acknowledge it is sharp
DPI refers to the physical size of an image when it is reproduced as a real physical entity, for example printed onto paper, or displayed on a monitor. A digitally stored image has no inherent physical dimensions, measured in inches or centimetres. Some digital file formats record a DPI value, which is to be used when printing the image.
This argument is getting old, but anyway...
There is enough information to acknowledge that the image is sharp enough for web viewing, but who knows how sharp it would appear at 12x8? Perception of sharpness has everything to do with magnification/enlargement. I do accept that you can make valid judgments about overall rendering from web images (up to a point), but when it comes to sharpness it only makes sense to say "sharp enough for a given size".
By the way, a lot of people are talking dpi. That is completely meaningless when talking about web images. The wikipedia article puts it more succinctly than I would:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dots_per_inch
Matthew