Be still my heart

It takes some dedication to walk around with 5 camera of different formats. Beautiful model though.

When I reverse search the image to find more information about it, AI seems to be getting it wrong. It says this is Diane Arbus which I think is wrong.

Does anyone know more about this picture?
 
It takes some dedication to walk around with 5 camera of different formats. Beautiful model though.

When I reverse search the image to find more information about it, AI seems to be getting it wrong. It says this is Diane Arbus which I think is wrong.

Does anyone know more about this picture?
It’s from a glamour photography in the 1950s website Glamour Photography in the 1950s

It is not Diane Arbus.
 
As someone who often carries 3 or more cameras on walks I feel seen.

That said, what's that thing on the Rolleiflex... I have seen it before, but no matter how much I rack my brain I come up blank...
 
Something is sad about this photo. Google shows it has been placed without credit to author in several places.
RFF just become one of them.
I'm guessing back in the day this was a commercial shoot and neither the model or photographer ever received any credit. They got paid, end of story. I wonder who the ad was for. Too many different cameras to be paid for by one camera company. A story line for some magazine.
 
She looks to have never held a camera, for photography. Never mind. Good chance it’s her leg. And not her only one. So that count is easy. To reassure R-G, it’s true I could not have counted correctly the number of cameras at first look. Diane Arbus she ain’t.
 
Back
Top Bottom