Best buys in a Leica lens?

K

kevin m

Veteran
Local time
1:57 PM
Joined
Oct 17, 2006
Messages
2,208
I was just thinking that with the price of the modern Leica glass having gone thru the roof recently, there are still good deals to be had in Leica glass. The most recent Elmar 50 is a great performer and a good value on the used market; the older Tele Elmar 135's are a screaming deal in Leicaland if you like that focal length.

What are your "best buy" Leica lenses? Any hidden gems or great "bang for the buck" lenses out there?
 
Elmarit-m 90mm, just discontinued. They're around for good prices and they look great... Don't flare like the TE, and aren't as big as the summicron.
 
In addition to the lenses that you mention:

- Screwmount collapsible Summicron 50/2
- classic 50/2.8
- Summicron-C 40/2
- any 90/4
- 135/2.8 (Series version)

In general, all lenses longer than 50mm didn't suffer from M8-related used price increases :)

Cheers,

Roland.
 
Last edited:
All those mentioned deals are deals that make you save a few meazly bucks.
I think anyone who got a Noctilux for 4000$ and below has a 1000$ deal in their hands. Now that's a deal.

Or a 40mm sumicron. This lens has always been a screaming deal.
 
Rigid Summicron 50/2. Optically identical to the DR but goes for less on the market. Get it CLA'd and it will give years of service - they don't make them like this any more. With careful looking they can be bought for around $350.
 
Elmar 50 and 90 or the Summicron C - at the other extreme, the F1.4 Summilux 75!

yours
FPJ
 
Last edited:
I can see the Cron Asph 35/2 being the next Noctilux. Wider, handles better, less distortion. Wait until the innerweb hears about this lens!
 
I have to agree with the 40/2 Summicron-C vote. Sharp as hell, with amazing bokeh. The most underrated lens in the Leitz lineup, and a complete steal on the used market.
 
Hm... on my list are: Summicron-C 40/2.0, Tele-Elmarit 90/2.8 (it is prone to flare but otherwise a great performing lens), Elmar-M 50/2.8 (I am astonished about the quality of this lens :))
 
cirque said:
35mm Summicron ASPH. Can be picked up for $1400, and it shines.
Click to expand...

I see the 35 cron asph losing favour not gaining it, brought about by the arrival of the ZM Biogon f2 and the summarit. This would appear to be the reason for the lower prices.

Personally i dont see any great deals in Leica lenses really. A used 35 Cron asph only appears cheap conpared to current new prices, but is expensive compared to the comparably performing ZM and to their new price 2 years ago. The latest 50 Elmar M can be had for a song....only compared to the new price which leapt up from $600 to $900 for a mint used as new lens at Popflash within about 12 months. In fact they are quite hard to find used for less than their new price 2 years ago. Maybe relatively unpoopular vintage glass is the way to go for a good deal, but then you are going to get a particular look/performance and not everyone wants that. for reaaly sharp, low flare modern lenses, there are no good value Leica options in my view. One has to buy Zeiss or CV. Its a shame...
 
New price of 35/2 cron asph in 2005/2006?

New price of 35/2 cron asph in 2005/2006?

Hi Turtle,

What was the new price 2 years ago? Thanks.


Turtle said:
I see the 35 cron asph losing favour not gaining it, brought about by the arrival of the ZM Biogon f2 and the summarit. This would appear to be the reason for the lower prices.

Personally i dont see any great deals in Leica lenses really. A used 35 Cron asph only appears cheap conpared to current new prices, but is expensive compared to the comparably performing ZM and to their new price 2 years ago. The latest 50 Elmar M can be had for a song....only compared to the new price which leapt up from $600 to $900 for a mint used as new lens at Popflash within about 12 months. In fact they are quite hard to find used for less than their new price 2 years ago. Maybe relatively unpoopular vintage glass is the way to go for a good deal, but then you are going to get a particular look/performance and not everyone wants that. for reaaly sharp, low flare modern lenses, there are no good value Leica options in my view. One has to buy Zeiss or CV. Its a shame...
Click to expand...
 
Turtle said:
I see the 35 cron asph losing favour not gaining it,
Click to expand...


i couldn't disagree more, this is a wonderful lens that will be appreciated sometime in the future. i have wondered for a long time why it seems to be ignored by so many people. tack sharp, good contrast, excellent build quality, small, light, etc...what's not to like?

bob
 
I agree Bob

I agree Bob

No disagreement here. Note that it is the #1 on the list of top M-mount lens here:

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?page=2&threadid=58930

(page down a bit)


bob338 said:
i couldn't disagree more, this is a wonderful lens that will be appreciated sometime in the future. i have wondered for a long time why it seems to be ignored by so many people. tack sharp, good contrast, excellent build quality, small, light, etc...what's not to like?

bob
Click to expand...
 
Its not that there is anything to dislike about the 35 cron asph per se, only that there is a lot of good competition (including from Leica). It certainly is not unique in the way the Noctilux is. When used summarits hit the market this might further reduce used asph cron prices. A used biogon could be had for well under half the price of a used asph and a new biogon is still about $600 less (enough to buy a new 50 planar too). I think all these factors have pushed asph cron prices down.

From popflash, I recall the lens could be had new for under $2k. Certainly quite a bit cheaper than now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom