Erik van Straten
Veteran
Benjamin Marks
Veteran
The best Barnack is the one you have with you . . .
Brambling
Well-known
good topic, I have never encountered any contradictions
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Erik van Straten
Veteran
I prefer the Leica III over the Leica ll mainly because the focus of the lll is much better: the focus finder of the III has a magnification of the image of 1.5x while the ll has to make do with a focus magnification of 1x. However, a lot of Leicas ll were renewed right after the war and got then the same focus magnification as the lll. That makes these Leicas ll a lot more attractive.
dab
Electromagnetic waves sensor
Is there a way to understand that Leica II was modified with magnified rangefinder? I'd like to get black II with such mod.However, a lot of Leicas ll were renewed right after the war and got then the same focus magnification as the lll. That makes these Leicas ll a lot more attractive.
Godfrey
somewhat colored
If it is a modification fitted after the point of manufacture, I imagine the only way to tell is to look through the rangefinder on the camera as there are likely very sparse records of what bodies were modified in this manner at Leica.Is there a way to understand that Leica II was modified with magnified rangefinder? I'd like to get black II with such mod.
G
Dralowid
Michael
...and early II cameras had a tinted rangefinder which made things easier. This can be done easily on later cameras with a little bit of coloured film. Alternatively there are the Leitz filters, I forget the exact name but OKARO? ORAKO? These now sell for silly money.
Shac
Well-known
I was very lucky to get one - I assumed it was modified after the camera was manufactured in 1932 (S/N 829XX) I have no idea when the modification occurred.If it is a modification fitted after the point of manufacture, I imagine the only way to tell is to look through the rangefinder on the camera as there are likely very sparse records of what bodies were modified in this manner at Leica.
G
Good luck with you hunt Godfrey

Godfrey
somewhat colored
Nice! I think it is @dab who's looking. I'm content with my '46 IIIc.I was very lucky to get one - I assumed it was modified after the camera was manufactured in 1932 (S/N 829XX) I have no idea when the modification occurred.
Good luck with you hunt Godfrey
...
G
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Coldkennels
Barnack-toting Brit.
There's two different models of that little contrast filter....and early II cameras had a tinted rangefinder which made things easier. This can be done easily on later cameras with a little bit of coloured film. Alternatively there are the Leitz filters, I forget the exact name but OKARO? ORAKO? These now sell for silly money.
The OKARO is the one for anything from the IIIc onwards - 11mm internal diameter. The ORAKO is the one for the earlier models with a 10mm internal diameter.
As for cost... one dealer in London currently has an OKARO available for £59 - but on eBay they're between £72 and £150! Absolutely daft.
Brambling
Well-known
Babruysk, 1999
Jonathan R
Well-known
You must live somewhere very flat?I guess it's like the gears on a bicycle in that you never use the extremes.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
I have one! A black paint one with chrome furniture, a post war modification.Is there a way to understand that Leica II was modified with magnified rangefinder? I'd like to get black II with such mod.
Shac
Well-known
Sorry about that Godfrey
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.