oldrangefinderguy
Member
Okay, here's the background. First, this is hardly my first time developing my own film. I've been at it for years. It's not a new batch of developer either. I used the same batch of diafine which had worked well on other films. Those familiar with diafine will know that the stuff just doesn't suffer with age but instead actually seems to get better. - Sort of like fine wine but hardly for internal consumption of course. The only difference here is in the tank I used. After dropping my trusty old plastic tank and busting a chunk off the lid, I decided it was finally time to try out the stainless steel tank and reel I had sitting around in the junk drawer. I never tried stainless before. A bit nervous about the whole infamous loading thing.
So that's the background. So I bit the bullet and practiced the loading thing and went for it. Blank film. Okay, two possibilities suggested themselves: one - I had grabbed an unexposed roll by mystake. two - I loaded it incorrectly. I was tempted to dismiss the latter possibility dispite some streaks on the film that could have indicated that the film was touching in places due to improper loading because I figured that the film should still have been properly developed where it was not touching.
A second attempt seemed in order. Unfortunately I got exactly the same results. Now a third possibility suggested itself: did I have a faulty tank that somehow did not allow the chemicals to flow correctly over the film? This also seems unlikely for the simple fact that the chemicals have to go somewhere. The tank is only big enough for one reel. The film would have to be submerged in the chemicals, right?
I'm at a loss to explain these results. What am I doing wrong? Any help would be appreciated.
thanks,
Randy
So that's the background. So I bit the bullet and practiced the loading thing and went for it. Blank film. Okay, two possibilities suggested themselves: one - I had grabbed an unexposed roll by mystake. two - I loaded it incorrectly. I was tempted to dismiss the latter possibility dispite some streaks on the film that could have indicated that the film was touching in places due to improper loading because I figured that the film should still have been properly developed where it was not touching.
A second attempt seemed in order. Unfortunately I got exactly the same results. Now a third possibility suggested itself: did I have a faulty tank that somehow did not allow the chemicals to flow correctly over the film? This also seems unlikely for the simple fact that the chemicals have to go somewhere. The tank is only big enough for one reel. The film would have to be submerged in the chemicals, right?
I'm at a loss to explain these results. What am I doing wrong? Any help would be appreciated.
thanks,
Randy