Bought a Olympus 35 RC

M

MaxFrank

Member
Local time
11:27 PM
Joined
Jul 16, 2011
Messages
45
After I bought a broken Canonet QL17 of ebay I wanted another little rangefinder (the canonet was actually my first rangefinder, not a great first experience) I just picked up a 35RC in very good condition for €30. It even came with the Olympus skylight filter.
The rangefinder is quite contrasty, but is only visible in good lighting, indoors things become a bit harder to focus, is this normal?
I think it's a great camera, especially for it's size and weight, ideal for street photography.
 
35 RC is a fine little rangefinder and indeed ideal for street. It's quite normal that the rangefinder patch becomes a bit pale with time and it can be a bit hard to see in low light but I wouldn't pay too much attention to it. No rangefinder camera is very good in low light.
 
Congrats on your acquisition! These are nice little cameras. I haven't tried to use mine indoors yet, but the rangefinder patch is pretty usable. Certainly easier to see than on an Oly XA.
 
I agree, the patch in my 35 RC is much clearer than the patch in my XA.

Contrary to Mablos' opinion, I find most of my rangefinders quite easy to focus and shoot in low light; except for my above mentioned XA and my Lynx 14 (with it's faded rangefinder mirrors)

Something that might help you... my 35 RC came with a very clear and bright viewfinder but the patch was dim and difficult to use indoors. A simple cleaning of the rangefinder window with a q-tip and windex brought an incredible improvement and it works well indoors now.
 
After messing around with many 'pocket' RF 35mm cameras, I decided that, even though the 35RC has some things I'm not crazy about, it was the one that did what I wanted. I sent it out for CLA to John Hermanson (USA), even though there wasn't much wrong with it. But he did two things that I didn't think could be improved: one was he made it updated to today's batteries, and two, he made the viewfinder and RF patch really great. Now it is my camera for 35; sharp lens, good meter, good RF, manual adjustment and auto, flashmatic, and an off setting. I won't go into the cons because the more I use it the less they bother me.
 
whitecat said:
I have an SP. I wonder if a CLA would help the viewfinder. What was the cost?
Click to expand...

John Hermanson's CLA for my 35RC was$81.00. Like I said all I wanted just to have a few things repaired but he will just do a CLA and do repairs. And I don't blame him. He does a good jobs.
 
35RC is my only Olympus RF and I like it despite shutter release (little too stiff, but with soft release it works fine). RF patch is quite good compared to some other makes of similar vintage. Auto mode isn't working on mine but I'm satisfied with M mode. I liked fact I hadn't to dismantle leaf shutter to get ot working as it's simplified version without many separate blades for shutter and aperture. This type of shutter as on 35RC normally work after all this years in closets and drawers.
 
btgc said:
35RC is my only Olympus RF and I like it despite shutter release (little too stiff, but with soft release it works fine). RF patch is quite good compared to some other makes of similar vintage. Auto mode isn't working on mine but I'm satisfied with M mode. I liked fact I hadn't to dismantle leaf shutter to get ot working as it's simplified version without many separate blades for shutter and aperture. This type of shutter as on 35RC normally work after all this years in closets and drawers.
Click to expand...

Yes, mine was in very good condition, it didn't even look like it had many rolls run though it (inside really clean). There was a looseness to the focusing barrel and a dented filter ring (which I didn't care about much except I couldn't get the ring off to tighten the barrel). Otherwise it worked perfectly. When I finally decided to use it (a lot) thought I would CLA it and fix the minor problems. Now it works great thanks to John Hermanson.
 
the oly 35rc was my first 'good' camera, bought brand new (with my own money) in around 1971...
i still have it...have not looked at it in years though...it has the oem filter and hood and cap too...iirc...
the lens is amazing for such a simple design...a triplet i think?
 
great camera. i think i sold mine on the rff. i remember not being too wild about how it rendered out of focus areas. but i do miss the thing. a lot. captured a lot of great family photos with it.
 
MRohlfing said:
Yes, it is 5 - more or less a Tessar + 1

It is an E.Zuiko ("E" = 5 by Olympus nomenclature)
Click to expand...


Whatever, it is very sharp, good color correction, excellent contrast and I would put it up against my old Leica lenses (LTM) any day. In fact, for a while I had an Olympus Trip 35 which I gave to an RF member (I bought it for, I think, $1.89) and it was unbelievably sharp, etc. Maybe old Olympus lenses are just superior, but nobody knows it. Or maybe they do, but nobody like me listens. Anyway, I'll keep this 35RC and enjoy it.
 
charjohncarter said:
...But he did two things that I didn't think could be improved: one was he made it updated to today's batteries, and two, he made the viewfinder and RF patch really great.
Click to expand...

Any idea what he (John Hermanson) might have done during the CLA to improve the viewfinder and RF patch so well? Was it just a cleaning? Something else?

Thanks! Dave
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom