Michael P.
Bronica RF
Some time ago, somebody in this forum was trying to sell a diopter for the Bronica RF645. Does anyone know if that sold or where I might find one?
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
I don't remember any FS here, but I posted a WTB.
KEH presently has a couple listed, but none I can use.
Chris
KEH presently has a couple listed, but none I can use.
Chris
Michael P.
Bronica RF
Chris, Thanks for the tip about the diopters at KEH. Why can't you use them?
RObert Budding
D'oh!
Diopters come in +/- corrections, and in different strengths - just like glasses.
I had one posted that didn't sell. I'll see if I can find it.
I had one posted that didn't sell. I'll see if I can find it.
Michael P.
Bronica RF
When I removed the rubber eyepiece from my Bronica RF 645, I found a -1 diopter in place. I bought this camera new. Is it standard for Bronica to install -1 diopters in new cameras?
Michael P.
Bronica RF
Found -1 Diopter in Bronica RF645
Found -1 Diopter in Bronica RF645
When I removed the rubber eyepiece from my Bronica RF 645, I found a -1 diopter in place. I bought this camera new and there is nothing about it in the instruction manual. Was it standard for Bronica to install -1 diopters in the RF645? If so, why?
Found -1 Diopter in Bronica RF645
When I removed the rubber eyepiece from my Bronica RF 645, I found a -1 diopter in place. I bought this camera new and there is nothing about it in the instruction manual. Was it standard for Bronica to install -1 diopters in the RF645? If so, why?
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
My RF645 came with a -1.0 diopter installed, too.
IIRC -1.0 (total for the entire viewing system) was standard for 35mm manual focus SLRs.
Perhaps Japanese camera industry research long ago determined that -1.0 is the best value
for the majority of buyers. I have always been slightly nearsighted so that's fine by me...
Chris
IIRC -1.0 (total for the entire viewing system) was standard for 35mm manual focus SLRs.
Perhaps Japanese camera industry research long ago determined that -1.0 is the best value
for the majority of buyers. I have always been slightly nearsighted so that's fine by me...
Chris
Last edited:
It's perfect for young eyes. My old eyes, even with my eyeglasses, requires I install a +.5 diopter in slrs and a +1 in Leicas, to get a really sharp image. The -1 was standard, though, in the RF645.
foto_mike
Established
Is it standard for Bronica to install -1 diopters in new cameras?
Yes, a -1 diopter is standard for the RF645. See section 1-4 of the manual (click here) for a description of the standard and optional diopters.
The RF645 is the lone Bronica with a -1 diopter as the standard. The ETR series, SQ series, and the GS-1 use a -1.5 diopter as standard. Here's a quote from the Tamron/Bronica web site about the ETR series. The SQ series and the GS-1 quotes say the same thing:
"Bronica finders are designed to simulate a 26.3" eye to focusing screen separation. If you normally have blurred vision at this viewing distance without glasses, you may consider replacing the standard -1.5 diopter eyepiece with one more suitable. "
Michael P.
Bronica RF
Yes, a -1 diopter is standard for the RF645.[/I]
Interesting. I thought I needed a diopter, but removing the -1 makes the viewfinder clear for me. Thanks, Mike.
Michael P.
Bronica RF
Thanks. I can see clearly when I remove the -1 and use no diopter at all.
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
KEH currently lists +2.0 and +3.0 diopter eyepieces for the RF645 if you need...
Chris
Chris
Michael P.
Bronica RF
Thanks, Chris.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.