Bronica rf645 pics

[maryland_fotos]

Robert, thanks! I had the camera set to its max ISO - 1600, and I believe I tried to adjust the shutter speed accordingly to compensate. The indoor shots look more suitably high ISO. Will dig out one of the indoor ones and post that.

 

[maryland_fotos]

Here's one taken indoors with the same combo.


Climbing by maryland_photos, on Flickr

 

[maryland_fotos]

One more with the RF645, 100mm lens and Ilford Delta 3200.


TheLook by maryland_photos, on Flickr

 

[rhl-oregon]

Yes, I can see the grain in this last one. Thanks for the info and the splendid examples.

Now I have to go get some D3200 to play with my Rf outdoors. I might even rate it a little lower....

 

[maryland_fotos]

The Ilford site for the film recommends between 400-6400 rating.

http://www.ilfordphoto.com/Webfiles/201071394723115.pdf
I have some 35mm Delta 3200 also out for development, maybe that will show more grain.

 

[rhl-oregon]

Yes, I'm wondering what 400 rating will look like outdoors. Oregon ain't especially contrasty-bright this time of year; lots of interesting overcasts, lights and darks, though.

I may shoot an outdoors roll at 400, or 800 if I get wishy-washy at the last minute. Did you use recommended Ilford development? (I take mine to a developer who'll push/pull etc., but otherwise will use recommended times in D76).

 

[maryland_fotos]

I send it out for development to darkroom in California, and just put in for normal development. Got a 35 roll back of the Delta 3200 and there's definitely more grain. Will post a couple samples in one of the Nikon threads.

 

[rhl-oregon]

From a roll of Ektar in Oregon summer, at the end of the haying season.

 

[mfogiel]

65/4
MF20141609 by marek fogiel, on Flickr


MF20142805 by marek fogiel, on Flickr

 

[maryland_fotos]

Good to see the RF645 thread wake up again. Cool Ektar color Robert. I presume the 45mm lens.

Mfogiel, nice RF645 b&ws.

 

[rhl-oregon]

^^nope, the 65mm. It's not a very tall tower ;-) or rather silo. (I have yet to load my Delta 3200, but there's an event this evening for which it should be good...)

 

[maryland_fotos]

Robert, any luck with the Delta 3200 film on the RF645? Here's one with the combo (100mm lens) at the New Orleans World War II museum.

WW2FighterNewOrleans by Maryland Photos, on Flickr

 

[rhl-oregon]

The roll is finished, awaiting the scan...;-)

 

[mfogiel]

MF20150901 by marek fogiel, on Flickr

 

[jim_jm]

Here's one with the 65mm lens on TMax100

[/url]Death Valley Dune by jimjm, on Flickr[/IMG]

 

[rhl-oregon]

^^^jimjm, incredible exposure/development/composition.

HP5 @250, 45/4

 

[rhl-oregon]

I meant to post these earlier. Delta 3200 @1600, overcast day in October.

 

[mfogiel]

^^ The last one is great Robert !

 

[Kent]

At what ISO did you rate that Delta 3200? Great image--still, looks more like FP4 or Delta 100.

True. But that's - for me - one of the great advantaged of medium format: a film that comes out grainy as a 135 shows little grain as a 120, even when developed in the same bath.

 

[rhl-oregon]

I devoted much of a roll of fp4 to ME--the RF's button for multiple exposure, but I was also the human subject in some of these.

But while it was about ME, not me, it took place in my backyard, so Mimi helped make some of the exposures more enigmatic.