Ken Ford
Refuses to suffer fools
I love my M6. But...
I have this urge to get a second M body to dedicate to my 40 Cron and 90 Elmar-C. I've never been happy using a 90 with a .72 VF, and the 40 really doesn't work well for me with the existing framelines. I tried a CL earlier this year, but it just wasn't for me.
I'm wondering if a nice user M3 would work for me instead. I've read the entire VF field works well for 40MM, and that the 90MM framelines are more usable because of the higher mag finder. It would make a nice two lens outfit as a change of pace from my M6 three lens rig (28-35-75).
I've always wanted a nice M2, but an M3 seems like it would be a better second body given the lenses I want to use with it.
Comments? Anybody with a 40 and an M3 care to comment?
I have this urge to get a second M body to dedicate to my 40 Cron and 90 Elmar-C. I've never been happy using a 90 with a .72 VF, and the 40 really doesn't work well for me with the existing framelines. I tried a CL earlier this year, but it just wasn't for me.
I'm wondering if a nice user M3 would work for me instead. I've read the entire VF field works well for 40MM, and that the 90MM framelines are more usable because of the higher mag finder. It would make a nice two lens outfit as a change of pace from my M6 three lens rig (28-35-75).
I've always wanted a nice M2, but an M3 seems like it would be a better second body given the lenses I want to use with it.
Comments? Anybody with a 40 and an M3 care to comment?