Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I've been bulk loading with cassettes from the local one hour for a month now ... it's simple and cheap and I can use 24 exposure rolls which is my preference. I need a couple of more loaders so I can have variation in film ready to load though.
Loading half a dozen rolls takes around ten minutes and is well worth the effort IMO. Nice to breathe life into the discarded free cassettes too!
Loading half a dozen rolls takes around ten minutes and is well worth the effort IMO. Nice to breathe life into the discarded free cassettes too!
briandaly
Established
I've been bulk loading with cassettes from the local one hour for a month now ... it's simple and cheap and I can use 24 exposure rolls which is my preference. I need a couple of more loaders so I can have variation in film ready to load though.
Loading half a dozen rolls takes around ten minutes and is well worth the effort IMO. Nice to breathe life into the discarded free cassettes too!![]()
Keith,
Which loader(s) are you using?
Brian
migtex
Don't eXchange Freedom!
Nowadays, I just used the Nikon F250 cartridges, load the entire Bulk (10 meters) and fire at will!
Develop it is another story..... not so easy!
Develop it is another story..... not so easy!
Nokton48
Veteran
I like bulk-loading film. I've got five or six loaders, for 100' rolls. Also you can buy Eastman Movie film, in 400' rolls. Here's the thread I started on using Eastman XX 5222 Movie Film, which has some totally cool retro-qualities.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=52426
Don't need a bulk loader for this stuff. Just stretch out an arms-wide length of XX, snip it off the 400' core, and wind-er-up. Couldn't be easier, and will never have any scratches using this method.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=52426
Don't need a bulk loader for this stuff. Just stretch out an arms-wide length of XX, snip it off the 400' core, and wind-er-up. Couldn't be easier, and will never have any scratches using this method.
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
Keith,
Which loader(s) are you using?
Brian
One's a Watson and the other one's a Computrol. They have fairly similar actions with Computrol having the addition of a counter that lets you know how much film you have left out of your roll. The Computrol came from Chris N and the Watson from a Nelson forum member. I would like couple more yet to keep in the fridge with specific films loaded. They're always for sale on eBay I've noticed but not too dear new ... around $30.00 from Freestyle from memory for the Watson. Except they're out of stock at the moment!
bsdunek
Old Guy with a Corgi
Do you mean just over a dollar each or is the actual number you get much higher?
AARRRRGG! My math skills are usually better than that! :bang: Wish I could buy them for a penny each. Sorry.
projectbluebird
Film Abuser
How many exposures to a 100ft roll, taking in consideration of lost exposures due to film loading in camera.
Here are some excerpts from a table in an old camera book of mine (1965) including leader and tail.
LENGTH OF FILM REQUIRED FOR ANY NUMBER OF EXPOSURES
exp. in./cm.
01 11.5/30
10 25.25/64
12 28.5/72
24 46.5/118
36 64.5/164
38 67.5/171
The original table is from 1 exposure to 38, inclusive. The full rolls per 100' using these number work out to 42 12exp, 25 24exp, 18 36exp, and not quite 18 for 38exp.
Share: