Samuel D
Established
I like the way you threw in a “maybe” here, leaving open the possibility that it is!If you find a decent M8 at a decent price, buy it - you won't regret it, but it is maybe not worth bankrupting yourself
That seems to be a common complaint, but I somehow managed to get by with Kodachrome 25 not so very long ago. ISO 160 is a luxury by comparison, and I think I could use ISO 320 indoors with good technique. Not ideal, but doable.I had an M8.2 for a couple of years. Used it professionmally on one project and daily shooting for awhile. The limitation on high ISO was a problem for me.
Easier said than done, though an M9 or M-E would be ideal (and I’d prefer either of them to the new Leica M). I’d be more tempted to save hard for an M9 if I were sure Leica wouldn’t run out of spare parts for it a mere few years down the road, as it did with the M8.Just save up for the M9.
This enchanting M8 brochure (PDF) makes me think the M8 has everything I need. The power of a well-designed brochure, eh.