W
wlewisiii
Guest
Bill M's recent post of the essay from the gentleman about his father's barnack leica got me wondering - is there any camera, out of any that you own, that you would prefer to see a decendant of yours using?
Starting this off, of all the cameras that I own I would rather see my son using my Speed Graphic. First of all, it has a historical connection to this country that Leica can't hope to match and second of all, it uses film holders that would be very easy to convert to wet plates. So that even if commercial film did disappear tomorrow, he'd still be able to use my century old B&L Tessar & Rapid Rectilinear the way they were intended to be used.
The Leica, the Zeiss and the Canons are all good cameras with exquisite glass. But if push comes to shove, I'd rather that he wanted to transform silver halides rather than work with the photoelectic principle. While I don't mind digital, I think there will always be a need for people to keep using superceeded techniques - much as, say, Mr. Wyeth uses egg tempera rather than oil based paint. Hence my preference...
Anyone care to bite? 😀
William
Starting this off, of all the cameras that I own I would rather see my son using my Speed Graphic. First of all, it has a historical connection to this country that Leica can't hope to match and second of all, it uses film holders that would be very easy to convert to wet plates. So that even if commercial film did disappear tomorrow, he'd still be able to use my century old B&L Tessar & Rapid Rectilinear the way they were intended to be used.
The Leica, the Zeiss and the Canons are all good cameras with exquisite glass. But if push comes to shove, I'd rather that he wanted to transform silver halides rather than work with the photoelectic principle. While I don't mind digital, I think there will always be a need for people to keep using superceeded techniques - much as, say, Mr. Wyeth uses egg tempera rather than oil based paint. Hence my preference...
Anyone care to bite? 😀
William