FrankS
Registered User
Isn't polygamy illegal?
Nick, denial and projection of your own faults onto others.
Clear and Simple, no objections necessary.
Just embrace the truth.
Clear and Simple, no objections necessary.
Just embrace the truth.
FrankS
Registered User
Pass the coolaid.
MikeL
Go Fish
mto'brien
Well-known
Thanks, Matt. On this and only this, I stand corrected. For the rest? Objectophiles (especially Brian Sweeney who clearly doth protesteth too much...) a few confessors, the rest in various stages of denial.
If anyone wishes, now that you've all been "outed", to marry one of your cameras, I can preform the ceremony for you on-line as I am a "preacher" too as you well know.
You are most welcome.
The idea that you would be willing to perform a wedding ceremony for me and one of my cameras is, however, preposterous.
Unless, of course, you would be willing to perform a ceremony in which you marry me to several of my cameras and a few lenses, then I am game. But this would clearly be a violation of the sanctity of "one man or woman, one camera" unions. Another thing to keep in mind before agreeing to performing the ceremony is that I will be marrying both film and digital. Yeah, I know. I'm like that.
Last edited:
FrankS
Registered User
You are most welcome.
. Another thing to keep in mind before agreeing to performing the ceremony is that I will be marrying both film and digital. Yeah, I know. I'm like that.
Bi ? (film/digital)
Last edited:
mto'brien
Well-known
Bi ?
mmmmmm hmmmmm. yep.
Teuthida
Well-known
In addition to using mechanical cameras, I refuse to use fire given its relative immaturity as a technology.
FrankS
Registered User
In addition to using mechanical cameras, I refuse to use fire given its relative immaturity as a technology.
My stand on this is not so extreme. I will use fire as long it is from a natural source (lightning, forest fire) not man-made/artificial.
Teuthida
Well-known
My stand on this is not so extreme. I will use fire as long it is from a natural source (lightning, forest fire) not man-made/artificial.
![]()
Let me guess: You're one of those guys who uses a light meter. Neophite.
Thanks, Matt. On this and only this, I stand corrected. For the rest? Objectophiles (especially Brian Sweeney who clearly doth protesteth too much...) a few confessors, the rest in various stages of denial.
If anyone wishes, now that you've all been "outed", to marry one of your cameras, I can preform the ceremony for you on-line as I am a "preacher" too as you well know.
Over 30 years ago, my Dad identified my collector traits as being "obsessive compulsive, probably due to be potty trained too early". And he was a PhD clinical Psychologist, specializing in suicide prevention. He was also around during my potty training.
Embrace the truth, harness the energy.
OOOHHHH! Lens has dirty poopoo on it.
Make poopoo go away!
So Nick, I see this thread as a desperate cry for help. Objectophilia- certainly explains the behavior that you have demonstrated on this forum over the past many years. But with this thread, your internal self has identified your own problems and character flaws. Not being able to confront the truth, you are projecting those problems on those around you.
Embrace the truth. At least fixating on one camera at a time is cheaper than being obsessive compulsive. However, based on prices of used lenses in the last two years- Glad I am! I suspect that I will be selling off a lot of gear after the first of the year. Now that I found the 1936 coated Sonnar from the test batch, maybe I'll turn to objectophilia and cash in the obsessive compulsive stuff.
Last edited:
Phil_F_NM
Camera hacker
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
NickTrop
Veteran
Bah, Brian, quit your foolish psychobabble. Eh? I don't remember when I was trained, I was pretty young at the time. This is Freudian psychology, by the way, and Freud is pretty much only credited as being the "inventor" of the field these days but his theories are not subscribed to. In your father's times, perhaps, you could have been a "Freudian psychologist" but no one in this field today would decribe themselves as such. Freud is as outdated as your many electro-mechanical "lovers".

Last edited:
FrankS
Registered User
It'd be interesting to list the various bandwagons/missions Nick has prophesied over the years. Thanks for the good humour, Nick!
Phil_F_NM
Camera hacker
It'd be interesting to list the various bandwagons/missions Nick has prophesied over the years.
There should be a thread!
Phil Forrest
Bah, Brian, quit your foolish psychobabble. Eh? I don't remember when I was trained, I was pretty young at the time. This is Freudian psychology, by the way, and Freud is pretty much only credited as being the "inventor" of the field these days but his theories are not subscribed to. In your father's times, perhaps, you could have been a "Freudian psychologist" but no one in this field today would decribe themselves as such. Freud is as outdated as your many electro-mechanical "lovers".
![]()
Nick.
Listen to your Id.
The Id knows.
And as you approach 50, let's look back on a life of loving cameras.
Do you have a "camera timeline" or "eras" in your photographic hobby pursuits?
early-mid 80's Ricoh AF 45
Gift from a girlfriend in college. She knew I wanted a camera, didn't want her to spend the money. She insisted. I requested a used Pentax K1000 but not to get it if it cost too much. She got me this, talked into it by the sales guy at the camera store. Not what I wanted but used it for a few years anyway. Not a bad little 80's AF camera. Sitting next to me right now (believe it or not), now disintegrated. But I really wanted an SLR and it nagged at me, so...
Circa late-80's/1990-2004 Cosina-made Vivitar V3800. All manual Pentax K-mount. Birthday gift from my father, a $100 blue-light special at K-Mart. Came with 50/1.8 Vivitar lens that wasn't terrible. Love this camera, still have it, still use it. It's still available new for around $155, one of the last of the Mohican film cameras still being produced and marketed as a "student camera". My only camera from 1990-ish until 2004 when it jammed. Took tons of pics with it, learned everything about photography from this camera - had to, due to all manual operation. However, it didn't think it was worth fixing and, 'sides, film is "dead" - time to "go digital".
2004-2006 Panasonic Lumix FZ-1v2.
Researched "what camera" obsessively (as always...) Intrigued by the "superzoom with IS" capabilities, I bought the Panny. It was strictly a P&S but there was a hack out on the Net that gave it A-priority and S-priority hence the "v2", which was only available in Japan. Had a ball with this camera, snapping and zooming all over, hand-held. Still gives remarkable results for paultry 2 megapixels imo. Started looking at old albums and realized that my old Vivitar did people shots much better. Missed selective focus, missed film. Wanted to get more "into" photography. Learn to develop my own, use larger formats. Still use this camera, mostly on the beach to get shots of kids in the ocean, etc. or whenever I need a big zoom. Also use it with a deep red filter for ir. Got back into film when I read online that sometimes a jammed camera can be fixed with a good "thwack" on its back with your hand. Worked a charm it did with the Vivitar. Gotta love the Internets.
2005-2009 The "GAS" Era
Started lurking on RFF, got "gas". Bought a bunch of fixed lens RFs along with various MF folders and other cameras. Shot mostly RFs in the pattern of "GAS", purchase, use a while, get "GAS" again, purchase... etc. Started rolling my own 35mm cartridges and developing my own black and white in 35 and 120 and printing in a make shift darkroom... Learned tons, had a blast...
2009-present Return to Digital
Decided "GAS" was silly. Decided that the vices of DSLRS that kept me from purchasing one were largely negated and price drops, size reductions and IQ improvements and battery life improvements over the years had made digital practical. Wanted to shoot more pics of "near-35mm" quality without the constraint imposed by film: the cost contraints of film as a consumable, the backlog of film to develop of have developed, etc. Felt digital had "arrived". Also intreagued by motion capture capabilities. Now I can walk around "wherever" like HCB and snap away at will. Still loyal to film I kept my favorite RF, always loaded, which is a Fujica Compact Deluxe - a gift from a RF member, the Vivitar my dad gave me as a gift (I'll never part with...), the Panny (essentially my digital "beater" and "zoom lens"), and the DSLR kit I recently decided on - the Nikon D5000 with a 35mm/1.8 prime lens that I shoot aperture priority, mostly, like the Yashica Electros I had a fondness for.
Nick, I think we have your number. You have it to. No wonder you're here on RFF.
Camera Lover.
Last edited:
paulfish4570
Veteran
this thread remains chuckle-icious ... 
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Over 30 years ago, my Dad identified my collector traits as being "obsessive compulsive, probably due to be potty trained too early". And he was a PhD clinical Psychologist, specializing in suicide prevention. He was also around during my potty training.
Dear Brian,
Generally a very worthy aim, but sometimes you wonder. There was a Welsh comedian, many years ago, who told the following story:
The doctor said, "Have you ever considered suicide?"
I said, "What do you mean, doctor?"
He replied, "You know: doing away with yourself."
I said, "NO!"
And he said, ""Well, I think you should..."
We've all met people like that. And a note to those who might accuse me of trivializing suicide. No, I'm not. But even suicides and would-be suicides can have a sense of humour.
Cheers,
R.
bgb
Well-known
Great joke Roger
The main problem i find with human females is it's difficult to find someone to do a CLA or any kind of repair work that gets them working like they used to long ago. If Youxin can return a M2 to its origonal as God made it beauty why can't someone do that for Suzy and Sarah?
The main problem i find with human females is it's difficult to find someone to do a CLA or any kind of repair work that gets them working like they used to long ago. If Youxin can return a M2 to its origonal as God made it beauty why can't someone do that for Suzy and Sarah?
Dear Brian,
Generally a very worthy aim, but sometimes you wonder. .
I loved the Burt Reynolds/Dom Deloise movie "The End". So did my Dad.
I remember when I was 11, and someone called the house on a Sunday evening and asked for my Dad. Found out later from Dad that the kid had a gun pointed at his head in the other hand. I listened to my Dad talking him out of shooting his head off. Freudian training worked in that case.
The main problem i find with human females is it's difficult to find someone to do a CLA or any kind of repair work that gets them working like they used to long ago. If Youxin can return a M2 to its origonal as God made it beauty why can't someone do that for Suzy and Sarah?
I suspect a sign of maturity is to respect someone and see them in the same light as you always have, as they grace with age.
I'm betting Roger understands this 100%.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.