Can someone explain this...

They obviously have a very different idea of what "good user condition" and "cleaning marks" are!

The Zeiss Contarex camera and lens used by Ed White on America's first space walk would be worth that much (or more) but an anonymous 35 'lux in such crappy condition?

Given the location perhaps they forgot to convert from Korunas to USD but that would still give it a BIN price of over $2200...
 
Obviously the seller thinks that the lens with a chrome front is rare, despite it being so roughed up, no?;)

Also, the mark on the front of the lens, ugghhh!!!:eek:

The seller must have been too weary, and typed an extra 0 at the back of 4400 dollars, or even 00 at the back of 440 dollars...
 
There are always ignoramus's around who have no idea of the value of things. To some of these bananas as soon as they see the word Leica, its a kind of wet dream to them as they start imagining how they can buy themselves a holiday home in Mustique or a townhouse in New York.
 
Given the rough overall condition, could the filter ring have been dented and then replaced with the chrome one? The price is nuts unless there's some provenance...
 
It is a rare version (black) of an already very rare lens (the "steel rim" 35mm Summilux) but in this condition it is way too expensive.

Erik.
 
Given the rough overall condition, could the filter ring have been dented and then replaced with the chrome one? The price is nuts unless there's some provenance...

Outlandish BIN prices are very common on ebay, for all manners of things, not just Leitz lenses. I think the rationale is the seller doesn't want to lowball himself and thinks there might be a buyer who will just throw money at something. (There's a lot of people in the world for whom 44k is a rounding error in their checkbook.)

The regular bidding is a fallback; once there's a bid the BIN price is moot. The lens is beat, I'm looking forward to seeing the eventual sale price, which will be well below the BIN. :D

s-a
 
Back
Top Bottom