Canon 100/2 LTM lens - should I ?

[uhoh7]

heads up
http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250928422220&ssPageName=ADME:B:WNA:US:1123

🙂

 

[menos]

Looks like a nice user, but should not get too expensive, as of the usual black Canon body marks.

Good luck with bidding to the new owner ;-)
… and don't forget to post pictures here as well!

 

[uhoh7]

well that one jumped right up--should have kept quiet I guess 🙁

 

[menos]

well that one jumped right up--should have kept quiet I guess 🙁

No, I don't think so - this looks like the usual going rate these days.
People find out about the nice LTM glass, that formerly has been kept under the sheets.

Now add original hood, caps, pouch and mint condition, and it sells for double that price :bang:

 

[rokkorx]

impressive broken, even f2 wide open

 

[menos]

Rokkorx - that photo of the empty cans has absolutely beautiful colors!
The look fantastic - did you do anything special in software or is this, how the colors turned out ?

 

[rokkorx]

Rokkorx - that photo of the empty cans has absolutely beautiful colors!
The look fantastic - did you do anything special in software or is this, how the colors turned out ?

The empty cans pic was taked by Samsung NX10, just the jpeg for the NX10, only adjust +-EV only without great PS.

I think Canon 100/2 is a very superb lens at all. however, i like Canon 85mm f1.5 more with the broken🙂