Jake Mongey
Well-known
Hey guys,
Recently the lens I have been looking for and lusting after for over a year came up in mint condition at my local camera shop right next to where I study for £350.
I am selling a lot of gear and have just got a job at McDonalds to fund it but i would like to get some opinions and sample images from you guys. I understand there are better 28mm lenses in LTM but my system of choice is canon and I like keeping everything authentic.
Recently the lens I have been looking for and lusting after for over a year came up in mint condition at my local camera shop right next to where I study for £350.
I am selling a lot of gear and have just got a job at McDonalds to fund it but i would like to get some opinions and sample images from you guys. I understand there are better 28mm lenses in LTM but my system of choice is canon and I like keeping everything authentic.
a.noctilux
Well-known
hello Jake,
I don't use Canon 2.8/28mm but 3.5/28mm that is a very nice LTM lens.
You may find some more infos, in these links:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=153738
Winogrand used Canon 28mm lens with his M4/M2:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-114165.html
more:
http://erickimphotography.com/blog/...grand-can-teach-you-about-street-photography/
Arnaud
I don't use Canon 2.8/28mm but 3.5/28mm that is a very nice LTM lens.
You may find some more infos, in these links:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=153738
Winogrand used Canon 28mm lens with his M4/M2:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-114165.html
more:
http://erickimphotography.com/blog/...grand-can-teach-you-about-street-photography/
Arnaud
pepeguitarra
Well-known
I have that lens and is is very good
I have that lens and is is very good
I also have the 28/3.5, which seems to produce sharper and more contrasty images wide open. I love both. The 28/3.5 is very very small, which is great.
I have that lens and is is very good
I also have the 28/3.5, which seems to produce sharper and more contrasty images wide open. I love both. The 28/3.5 is very very small, which is great.
pepeguitarra
Well-known


Calzone
Gear Whore #1
I have owned the chrome version of the 28/3.5 and presently own a later black version of the 28/3.5. Both are great and have a tiny size. The chrome version had a nice heavy build quality, but the newer black version has better ergonomics (bigger focus ring).
My lenses are both single coated and render wonderfully in B&W. There is a retro look where wide open the center is mucho sharp, but that does not extend all the way to the corners.
Cal
My lenses are both single coated and render wonderfully in B&W. There is a retro look where wide open the center is mucho sharp, but that does not extend all the way to the corners.
Cal
lxmike
M2 fan.
good luck with your quest for a Canon 28mm
02Pilot
Malcontent
I had an early 28/3.5, which I sold when I bought a 28/2.8. I find the 2.8 more capable of producing images that are sharp across the frame from around f/5.6, with the 3.5 really needing to be in the optimal f/8 or f/11 range to do so. The extra stop (well, almost) is nice to have, but practically speaking I don't think there's that big a performance gap between the two.
Share: