David Murphy
Veteran
Any good camera tech can repair a filter ring dent for a small fee (about the cost of lunch in whatever currency). The dent on the ring does imply however that the lens got a bang somewhere in its past. The CV 40/1.4 is a beautiful lens, very well made, very useful, and sharp - also a good choice.
Gallo
Member
Thanks, David!
ethics_gradient
Well-known
Might be of interest to those of you in the thread, just came across this one on eBay 50mm f/1.2 for $500 BIN. Should be able to knock almost $40 off that with the cashback, which ends at the end of the month.
kurotama
Established
I just got a 50/1.2 with P body at ¥40,000 at Yahoo! Auction in Japan. The lens has no fungus or haze though exterior is slightly beat up.
It holds and feels fine.
It holds and feels fine.
Gallo
Member
wow, nice lens you got Kurotama!
drewbarb
picnic like it's 1999
I bought one of those Canon 50 1.2 from Raid a few years back, and it's still a favorite lens; I've never been tempted to sell it. As far as cameras to mount it on goes, I normally use an M3- this is a brilliant pairing. The R3x is certainly the best Bessa to use a lens like this on. All the Bessas have the same physical RF base length; the R3 cameras with their 1:1 finders have the highest magnification factor for the longest effective RF length of any Bessa, but it's still not much.
The bottom line on function for this pairing is that wide open at close focusing distances would be pretty tricky to nail focus, but stopped down and/or at longer distances you'll probably like it a great deal. My own experience is that a 50mm lens on a 1:1 finder camera is an absolute joy to use. I keep both eyes open and get that floating frameline effect, with little visual awareness of the camera at all. Framing this way is as natural as photography gets, IMO. The 40mm framelines on the R3 cameras are ok, but a bit trickier to see- I have to do more searching (I don't wear glasses).
The bottom line on function for this pairing is that wide open at close focusing distances would be pretty tricky to nail focus, but stopped down and/or at longer distances you'll probably like it a great deal. My own experience is that a 50mm lens on a 1:1 finder camera is an absolute joy to use. I keep both eyes open and get that floating frameline effect, with little visual awareness of the camera at all. Framing this way is as natural as photography gets, IMO. The 40mm framelines on the R3 cameras are ok, but a bit trickier to see- I have to do more searching (I don't wear glasses).
Mephiloco
Well-known
There have been a few 50/1.2 for sale here recently. I missed the first one (went for $400 iirc) and then got the 2nd ($440), which unfortunately has a slight problem with the focus ring, about to develop my first shots with the lens wide open 
sfox
Member
Canon 55 1.2 FL
Canon 55 1.2 FL
Hi Raid,
I am very interested to know where did you see this and do you know of someone whom can do the mod for the 55/1.2 FL to M mount. Thanks
Canon 55 1.2 FL
Hi Raid,
I am very interested to know where did you see this and do you know of someone whom can do the mod for the 55/1.2 FL to M mount. Thanks
aoresteen
Well-known
To use a Canon 50mm f/1.2 wide open you really need an M3. With a .91 viewfinder the effective RF base is 62.33. Even with that I miss too often!
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
I guess I was very lucky... I got mine from the auction site, on a Best Offer deal, for $400, with hood! The adapter came from Fotodiox (an Illinois company) and I used it for a while with my M3. I'll eventually will send it to Sherry for a clean up, but right now I haven't had any problem with it.