I travel quite a bit into Russia, Ukraine, London and now Mongolia and I often throw in either a Canon AF35M or a Canon 35ML and I've come back with some nice P&S pics. I sometimes think that some of the early AF cameras produced some sharper images than what I get with newer ones. I presently have around three Canon AF35Ms, one virtually mint with a mint case and TELE @ WA attachments in a mint case. I haven even tried that one out yet. I personally don't think from my experience that the 2.8 is sharper than the ML's 1.9 lens. I returned with some fantastic images taken atop the London Eye with my ML, with beautiful color and sharp images even though they were taken through a plexiglas of our gondola. Long live Canon! I'm presently looking for asn ML that handles ISO 1000 rather than 400. I did find one on EBay in nice condition but it gave up the ghost shortly after I purchased it.