Canon LTM Canon ltm 50mm f1.8

[Captain]

The prices seem to be higher these days. I have been looking for a good copy.

So what would a heavy chrome (non serenar) version of this lens fetch in the classifieds do people think?

 

[projectphill]

Question where can I purchase the LTM to M adapter for the Canon Rangefinder 50mm F 1.8 Leica Screw Mount LTM M39 RF Lens?

 

[Scrambler]

Question where can I purchase the LTM to M adapter for the Canon Rangefinder 50mm F 1.8 Leica Screw Mount LTM M39 RF Lens?

Um... nearly anywhere. New from Cameraquest or Leica, or any number of eBay sellers. Any 50mm LTM-M adapter will work. I use chromed brass Chinese eBay versions, never had issues with focus or fit.

 

[Mackinaw]

Also, Igor Camera has a few in stock.

Jim B.

 

[projectphill]

Um... nearly anywhere. New from Cameraquest or Leica, or any number of eBay sellers. Any 50mm LTM-M adapter will work. I use chromed brass Chinese eBay versions, never had issues with focus or fit.

Sweet thank you

 

[kuuan]

this thread needs more photos!

NNEX5n, Boudha, Kathmandu

Ricoh GXR M, orphan's home, Saigon

Ricoh GXR M, Lebih beach, Bali

Ricoh GXR M, China town, Saigon

 

[Fixcinater]

Just picked up a version 2 w/meters (f/22) and haze on the first surface of the rear group. Hopefully I can get it cleaned up, I want to get my 50s down to Canon 50/1.2 and 1.8 or maybe the 1.2 and a J-8 if the Canons are too similar.

 

[Mark C]

It is hard to imagine the Canons will be very similar; the 1.2 is a pretty wacky lens. I like mine and need to use it more, but it has not been my idea of a general purpose lens. The 1.8 should be a nice all around, well corrected lens with much better edge performance. I'm starting to care a bit less about that lately, but it is certainly something nice to have when you need it.

 

[bmiller128]

Chrome Canon 50/1.8 on M3, TMax 100.

At f/2:
Quakertown Farmers Market by bmiller128, on Flickr

Wide open:
Telephone Pole by bmiller128, on Flickr

At f/2.8:
House and Trees by bmiller128, on Flickr

 

[bmiller128]

Some interesting bokeh at f/5.6: Chrome Canon 50/1.8, on M3, TMax 400:

Branch and Bokeh by bmiller128, on Flickr

 

[Tijmendal]

So, I've got some haze on my copy as well. I opened the lens up, but it's all on the elements in front of the aperture. I don't know how to get there. I did remove the front-retainer ring, but that allowed me only to the very first elemnt.
Does anyone know how to get to the elements in front of the aperture blades (coming from the rear of the lens)?
Thanks.

 

[superultramega]

In viewing the photos in this thread I think the lens handles flare well. But I'm curious how people think the Canon deals with flare if a lens hood isn't used. My Canon Serenar copy was just repaired/cleaned but I don't have a hood. I'm excited to use it on my upcoming trip to Texas to see/photograph my pregnant friend but I'm a little anxious about late afternoon light. Thoughts?

 

[bmiller128]

I don't have a hood either, and I haven't really noticed any problems with flare. Here's a wide-open test shot with a flashlight free to flare away:
Canon 50/1.8 at f/1.8 by bmiller128, on Flickr

(See also the rest of the flickr album for the same shot with other lenses, if you want to compare.)

Also in my "House and Trees" shot a few posts back, there was some pretty harsh sun coming from the side. I may have shaded the lens with my hand.

-Ben

In viewing the photos in this thread I think the lens handles flare well. But I'm curious how people think the Canon deals with flare if a lens hood isn't used. My Canon Serenar copy was just repaired/cleaned but I don't have a hood. I'm excited to use it on my upcoming trip to Texas to see/photograph my pregnant friend but I'm a little anxious about late afternoon light. Thoughts?

 

[cRonaldo07]

Thank you for this thread, i bought the serenar with no regret 😀

Mine open wide with Portra 160
My Sister by Adiva Setiawan, on Flickr

 

[Greyscale]

Somehow, I have found myself with two of these, an early chrome and a later black version.


Canon IVF, Kodak BW400CN by Greyscale3, on Flickr


Canon IVF, Serenar 50/1.8, CVS 400 film, iPhone light meter app by Greyscale3, on Flickr

 

[John E Earley]

I have a chrome non-Serenar version with clear glass though slightly scratched front lens and it seems to work great. I also recently picked up a version 3 that looks mint but came with some internal haze that cleaned nicely. Both lenses were purchased within the last few months for less than $100 each.

In the past I had a Serenar chrome version that had the internal haze but as mentioned, it was an easy job to clean it and it was like new. I traded it off but the recent purchases solved that issue.

 

[goamules]

My very clean later chrome one, I'm starting to shoot again to compare to my Summicron.

 

[farlymac]

That's a helluva way to fix an ingrown toenail. 😱

PF

 

[f.hayek]

Can't say I'm crazy for the colors. B&W appears to be its raison d'être.

 

[lxmike]

just grabbed one of these for £125 it seems haze free, will see if that is the case on arrival😱