38Deardorff
Well-known
B, after your trip you'll have to tell us if you had just enough gear or ....too much.The gear I am taking is pretty pricey. The X2D and XCD 55V cost me two grandchildren and an ex-wife. LOL Add in the 120 3.5 macro tele and we are talking way more than I want to lose. I'd like to bring along an A7 III also with two lenses. Then the batteries, filters and so on, it is way more than I can afford to replace. That gear tapped me out. So insurance is a must. As it comes to more than $5K I think I have to get pro coverage. That's OK, call it duck if you want. Just cover me. ;o)
I am really trying to get all my ducks in a row way before I leave. Last minute stuff is terrifying. Yeah, I could do it with an M9 and three or four lenses, but . . .
Apart from road trips with a 5x7" & 4x10", the last trip i took a lot of gear was to the Himalaya in the late '80s. I had a Pentax LX w/ a 24 & 80-200, and a Leica M6 with a 35 & 50. Carried them everywhere for 30 days of trekking and i'm pretty sure i didn't have insurance on them. If i were doing the trip today i'd likely get by with less.... a 35mm Summilux & a 90mm for mountain close-ups would do it for me or just a Rolleiflex.... i always have trouble deciding..... but a single camera Rolleiflex or Leica....well that's almost like you know "wallet & watch."
Last edited: