M
Magus
Guest
Post deleted by posters request
raid said:Solution for the puzzle:
#1 is the 35/1.5
#2 is the 35/3.5
#3 is the 35/1.8
#4 is the 35/2.0
#5 is the 35/2.8
It seems that the vintage Canon lenses are resistant to flare.
At least at 4.0 it is difficult to figure out which lens was used here.
Raid
dexdog said:Raid, the test surprises me- there is not a great amount of difference between the Canon lenses at f4. I was surprised that the flare was not more pronounced on the Canon 35/1.5. When I have used this lens outside, flare has always been an issue, and I always tried to remember to bring a hood. Did you use a hood on these shots? I am guessing that you didn't, but would be interested in finding out anyway.
raid said:I will soon have with Roland's help about 85 images ready to show here via a link. The labeled images already have been uploaded, and Roland will next (I think) add some improvements.
I encourage you to compare the shots taken with 35mm to the shots taken with 50mm lenses in the previous lens test. With the 35mm lenses I don't see any bokeh in my set-up but with the 50mm lenses we could clearly see the bokeh characteristics with a slightly different set-up. Why?
Raid
Huck Finn said:My guess is that it's because the 50 mm focal length has shallower depth of field & therefore more OOF area to show bokeh characteristics. In addition, the slower 35 mm lenses, of which there are a number in this test, have even further reduced opportunity for much OOF area. So far, only shots at f/4 have been posted, which is not the best opportunity to see OOF area at 35 mm focal length.
ferider said:That is because the left light bulb in the Summilux pic is switched off (on the ferider site).
Raid, do we have pictures of the Summilux with the left light bulb switched
on, and at f2 and higher ? Just noticed this. Or are we missing some in the gallery ?
Thanks,
Roland.