kram
Well-known
efix, you can looks mint- great buy. With mine, I am hoping that the film canister is at fault. The way the camera is constructed, it is hard to see were there could be a light leak.
My lend condition looks great (like yours), but there are pain scrap off the rear edges.
My lend condition looks great (like yours), but there are pain scrap off the rear edges.
oktyone
Member
Gorgeous! if you ever get a chrome one, you can swtich backs and make em pandas 
! . I really wish kyocera/contax would have made a dedicated leather case for it as they did with the rest of the T line, the original pouch is just ok, mine came pretty worn out though.
If anyone ever gets the repair manual i'd love to know where the camera light seals are located and how they should be replaced, mine are ok right now, but won't probably be for much longer.
! . I really wish kyocera/contax would have made a dedicated leather case for it as they did with the rest of the T line, the original pouch is just ok, mine came pretty worn out though.If anyone ever gets the repair manual i'd love to know where the camera light seals are located and how they should be replaced, mine are ok right now, but won't probably be for much longer.
efix
RF user by conviction
Gorgeous! if you ever get a chrome one, you can swtich backs and make em pandas
Yes, I just thought of that yesterday
micromoogman
Well-known
I also have a bad light leakage coming from somewhere down right, just where the sprocket hole is located. You can actually see the fall off from the sprocket teeth. It is a mystery how the light enters here... Kram, did you manage to fix your leak?
efix
RF user by conviction
I also have a bad light leakage coming from somewhere down right, just where the sprocket hole is located. You can actually see the fall off from the sprocket teeth. It is a mystery how the light enters here... Kram, did you manage to fix your leak?
Considering the lens projects the picture onto the film upside-down and mirrored, shouldn't the light be coming from somewhere top right?
micromoogman
Well-known
it should be up left in the picture... I don't know why this is showing that the light is coming from top right... I'll check the other negs.
kram
Well-known
My light leak is worse than yours (gulp), bit in the same position. Weird thing is, the sprocket hole shows light leak, but the thin bit of film between the sprocket and edge of the film (2-3mm) is clear. Some of the foam is missing in the top section of the camera. I will try and replace that.
Wife wanted new TV and for me to sort out the roof aerial today (pure joy - I hate working at height). Both TV roof aerials now in the roof, rather than on it (they have boasted the TV signal in the last year). One TV (the new one OK). The main house TV, nor so - need a new signal boaster by the looks of things. Hopefully will give it a go at fixing the seal monday or Tuesday night).
Wife wanted new TV and for me to sort out the roof aerial today (pure joy - I hate working at height). Both TV roof aerials now in the roof, rather than on it (they have boasted the TV signal in the last year). One TV (the new one OK). The main house TV, nor so - need a new signal boaster by the looks of things. Hopefully will give it a go at fixing the seal monday or Tuesday night).
efix
RF user by conviction
Just finished scanning a first test-roll of cheap generic drug store ISO 200 colour negative film -- camera seems to be working fine, and it looks as though that little Sonnar is (theoretically) cabaple of producinig some outstanding results.
Only problem has been with getting the colours right in those darn scans ... next time I'll either have prints made, or use slide film right away. Anyway, here are some shots that turned out halfway decent. No artistic value whatsoever, just test shots to see if everything works as it should.
Only problem has been with getting the colours right in those darn scans ... next time I'll either have prints made, or use slide film right away. Anyway, here are some shots that turned out halfway decent. No artistic value whatsoever, just test shots to see if everything works as it should.
kram
Well-known
OK folks- here's the latest. The foam around the film canister area had been removed, but the source of light on the negative (bottom left of photo) suggested top right on the camera back (underneath the film wind on lever). Sure enough the foam was missing down to the bear metal. Spent 1 hour completely removing foam (used cut down cocktail sticks). Have replace all back foam seal with new replacement camera foam material. Reloaded film and will report back.
efix
RF user by conviction
Some more, this time on a different cheap drugstore 200 ISO film. These turned out a little better in terms of colour. Not sure if it's my processing, the scanner software, or the actual emulsion.
The apple tree in our garden.
Once more.
In the car.
Self portrait in a blue tinted window. This is what was left in terms of colour and contrast after removing the blue tint.
Elderly lady with dog.
I really like this shot, but what's that dreadful line?
What a superb little camera -- I'm totally in love with it! Small and pocketable, unobtrusive, quiet, and a truly wonderful little lens! Just running a roll of Velvia 50 through it, can't wait for the results
The apple tree in our garden.
Once more.
In the car.
Self portrait in a blue tinted window. This is what was left in terms of colour and contrast after removing the blue tint.
Elderly lady with dog.
I really like this shot, but what's that dreadful line?
What a superb little camera -- I'm totally in love with it! Small and pocketable, unobtrusive, quiet, and a truly wonderful little lens! Just running a roll of Velvia 50 through it, can't wait for the results
micromoogman
Well-known
OK, I know that I have a seal there, the condition might be inadequate though. I haven't done anything yet to mine except shooting a roll with taped body.
HoodedOne
Well-known
F074-035.jpg by HoodedOne, on Flickr
I have a Contax-T for a couple of months now. And I love this little camera. The shot above is from one of the first rolls I shot with it.
micromoogman
Well-known
So I have just developed a roll of Tri-x with the taped camera back, and alas the light leak is still there! The whole upper part of the body was taped with black tape. So either the leak is coming from below, battery or tripod mount, or from the lens assembly. Next step will be to shoot a roll with the whole bottom of camera taped. The seal by the film canister might also be the source of fault. So I'm eagerly waiting for kram's results.
efix
RF user by conviction
Please keep us updated, guys!
emraphoto
Veteran
I have long been on the lookout for a black version. Really interested in shooting one!
kram
Well-known
Got my second film back today, first part of film shot as it was, second part with replacement foam. Kodax 125px. I am goig to use up my 35mm stock before I order any more. Have now put my usual compact camera B+W film in the T, Ilford XP2 Super.
Attachments
Last edited:
efix
RF user by conviction
That looks good! Glad your T is in working order again!
micromoogman
Well-known
I was not lucky. Second roll with taped bottom plate also has light leaks. So if the light is not coming from the camera back, where does it come from? It could be the foam where the film canister sits, like kram's, but I don't understand where the light source is coming from...
sleepyhead
Well-known
Hi Micromoogman, bummer about the light leak.
I don't have my Contax T in front of me right now, but isn't there a kind of bellows on the inside that allows the lens to be extended out?
I'm wondering if that's where your leak is.
Good luck.
I don't have my Contax T in front of me right now, but isn't there a kind of bellows on the inside that allows the lens to be extended out?
I'm wondering if that's where your leak is.
Good luck.
efix
RF user by conviction
There is indeed, but I wonder if that wouldn't have a more general effect on the whole frame?