Contre Jour, is it the thinking mans' bokeh?

4018127093_218b1c1840_z.jpg



4459213998_065f03e4fe_z.jpg
*


4057798734_33c94969e1_z.jpg
*


4427862169_4c6ae8e3c1_z.jpg
*


3909225671_2537de0a84_z.jpg
*


4550207089_a5758085f8_z.jpg
*


4093417469_6cd2116598_z.jpg
*


4018126959_493e499411_z.jpg
*


3942988728_8611f8bc4a_z.jpg
 
I don't want to disrupt this thread too much (because it's an awesome thread), but something really strange is going on and I'd appreciate a private message from anyone who can explain it to me. Four days ago I posted a comment (#119) on this thread. At that time I attempted to include a photo by using one of the links provided by flickr. Flickr has changed the links they provide and I couldn't ever get it to work. I posted some html, it didn't work, I edited the post and took it out. I tried it a couple of different ways before I gave up and just removed it all. This all took just a few minutes. Now my post is just a short comment. But, for the last four days I've been getting a lot of hits on that same photo on my flickr page showing RFF as the referrer. I don't get it. How is that possible. If you have any clue what I'm talking about, or if you can see my photo (in post number 119), please shoot me a PM. This is really not important, but it's driving me mad. :)

Thanks!
Paul
 
photophorous said:
I don't want to disrupt this thread too much (because it's an awesome thread), but something really strange is going on and I'd appreciate a private message from anyone who can explain it to me. Four days ago I posted a comment (#119) on this thread. At that time I attempted to include a photo by using one of the links provided by flickr. Flickr has changed the links they provide and I couldn't ever get it to work. I posted some html, it didn't work, I edited the post and took it out. I tried it a couple of different ways before I gave up and just removed it all. This all took just a few minutes. Now my post is just a short comment. But, for the last four days I've been getting a lot of hits on that same photo on my flickr page showing RFF as the referrer. I don't get it. How is that possible. If you have any clue what I'm talking about, or if you can see my photo (in post number 119), please shoot me a PM. This is really not important, but it's driving me mad. :)

Thanks!
Paul
Click to expand...

You have to use the URL of the actual photo file, not just the webpage where the photo appears. (it should end in .jpg or something)
Like so:
2040886331_1a701ad98f_o.jpg

Just quote this to see what I did.
 
punkromance said:
You have to use the URL of the actual photo file, not just the webpage where the photo appears. (it should end in .jpg or something)
Like so:

Just quote this to see what I did.
Click to expand...

Hey, thanks for the reply, but I still don't get it. What exactly do you see in my original post? All I see is this:

photophorous said:
set-72157608011646769
Cool thread. There are a lot of great shots here.
Click to expand...

That's why I'm confused. How did you get the link to that photo when it's not showing in my post?

Also, when I quoted your post, it just showed my photo...no html or anything. (I deleted the photo from this reply.)
 
hi

hi

I sent you a PM on how to stop the hits, but if you do want to post your image, just edit your post #119 and put this in there:

replace the "x" in http below with "p"

2040886331_fb34b8fcc8.jpg


photophorous said:
Hey, thanks for the reply, but I still don't get it. What exactly do you see in my original post? All I see is this:



That's why I'm confused. How did you get the link to that photo when it's not showing in my post?

Also, when I quoted your post, it just showed my photo...no html or anything. (I deleted the photo from this reply.)
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom