pvdhaar
Peter
I couldn't have said it better!nico said:I'd add, for my experience, that the 50mm is a good "storyteller".
Ciao![]()
The 50; able to isolate a subject, and able to give a clue about the context at the same time.. perfect..
J J Kapsberger
Well-known
pvdhaar said:The 50; able to isolate a subject, and able to give a clue about the context at the same time.. perfect..
That just about nails it, I'd say. To me, it's the most versatile FL.
I went out shooting last night with my 35mm. I had a hell of a time making it work for me. I felt like a fish on land. Lately, I've used my 50mm for about 90% of my shooting. It's the FL I'm used to. It's always been the easiest one for me to use.
Add me to the 'Gang of 50'.
M
Magus
Guest
Post deleted by posters request
jarski
Veteran
M
Magus
Guest
Post deleted by posters request
M
Magus
Guest
Post deleted by posters request
iml
Well-known
For me, 50 is nearly always the first choice, for street, portraits, landscapes, abstracts, whatever. Every other focal length apart from 40/42mm feels like trying to fit a composition to match the FL of the lens I'm using, but with a 50 I nearly always get exactly the composition I saw before I lifted the camera to my eye.
I like 28mm on occasion too, but it could never be my standard lens.
Nowadays my lens collection is limited entirely to one 28 and a couple of 50s. Don't feel the need to add to it.
Ian
I like 28mm on occasion too, but it could never be my standard lens.
Nowadays my lens collection is limited entirely to one 28 and a couple of 50s. Don't feel the need to add to it.
Ian
Last edited:
M
Magus
Guest
Post deleted by posters request
M
Magus
Guest
Post deleted by posters request
kalokeri
larger than 35mm
Thanks for your story, Bosk.
Sometimes I think of trying something wide, but then I realise that so far my 35mm didn´t get that much use. I prefer 50mm. It´s how I see. Nevertheless I go on trying to find a relationship to 35mm.
Thomas
Sometimes I think of trying something wide, but then I realise that so far my 35mm didn´t get that much use. I prefer 50mm. It´s how I see. Nevertheless I go on trying to find a relationship to 35mm.
Thomas
M
Magus
Guest
Post deleted by posters request
3js
Established
No, I don`t like it at all. No matter how I tried, the answers is no. With the 50 I`m allways too close, and I find it also very very boring FL. You need a ladder to make it interesting, and the DOF is very limiting. A very difficult FL to make an interesting shot, but I know it can be done... I just can´t, and I´m tired to make it happen.:bang:
N
Nikon Bob
Guest
All the 50mm FL lenses that I have used gave excellent results but I just never could live with only a 50. I don't do street and maybe that is part of it. The 35 is my most used lens. I do own a 50/3.5 Elmar with no serial number and believe that it is from a period when Leica lenses first became interchangeable with various bodies. Just a surprising lens to use even today. Nice to see someone can eventually get it and maybe I'll have another go too.
Bob
Bob
gabrielelopez
Established
the 50 takes away all the effects and leaves just your vision, your timing and your style....
My only lens when using a RF, so 99% of the time.
My only lens when using a RF, so 99% of the time.
Share: