CrisR
Well-known
CrisR
Well-known
CrisR
Well-known

Private Space Underground by Cris Rose, on Flickr
and my new self-designed hood

ZM 50mm Planar Compact Hood by Cris Rose, on Flickr

ZM 50mm Planar Compact Hood / Top by Cris Rose, on Flickr
siracusa
Well-known
I've just bought a Planar, and shot my first images tonight - it's my only modern lens (I usually tend to prefer older, lower contrast lenses). I was originally choosing between a modern Sonnar and a vintage Sonnar. In the end I decided to get two lenses for my money - a secondhand ZM Planar for the modern look with its sharpness and higher contrast, and I'm now looking around for a Jupiter 3 for the Sonnar and vintage look. The images in this thread are very impressive and had much to do with my final decision.
lam
Well-known
Forgot to post in this thread since I got mine..

Peanuts can make good gifts. by lamlux.net, on Flickr

Tattered wear. by lamlux.net, on Flickr

The bakery outlet, was a bike dealer. by lamlux.net, on Flickr

Peanuts can make good gifts. by lamlux.net, on Flickr

Tattered wear. by lamlux.net, on Flickr

The bakery outlet, was a bike dealer. by lamlux.net, on Flickr
thompsonks
Well-known
Cris, you're getting lovely highlight and shadow detail.
Kirk
Kirk
siracusa
Well-known
I'm new to the Planar - I've only had mine a few weeks. It still hasn't supplanted the collapsible Summicron as my favourite lens, but I am really liking it.


helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
lam
Well-known
goo0h
Well-known
nice.
interesting....
slava
Established
siracusa, Just bought the planar again and won't sell it. Its a gem
siracusa
Well-known
slava, your planar images are indeed lovely, so I'm glad to see you bought it back again 
slava
Established
I'm glad to. the 0.7 minimum focus distance is really important on the planar btw. that's why I use planar allmost all the time. sonnar is waiting for only the right moments.
Art Vandalay
Imported from Detroit

Fire Escape 1 by Black Jack Shellac, on Flickr

Building by Black Jack Shellac, on Flickr
Both with the M3 and Zeiss Planar 50
fuwen
Well-known

f2 1/125 Rollei 35RF Portra 400
lam
Well-known

Property has been around the block. by lamlux.net, on Flickr

An epitome of the midwest. by lamlux.net, on Flickr
redisburning
Well-known
I will be honest I am starting to feel like 35mm film is just not my thing and may try to move my m2 / planar. If it's the best lens I own in 35mm, I wouldn't know it. My poor Minolta cant tell if it's at f2 or f8.
We had a strong wind come through and it knocked this grill into the lake:

Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
the fall beat it up pretty bad

Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
400TX in rodinal 1+50
We had a strong wind come through and it knocked this grill into the lake:

Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
the fall beat it up pretty bad

Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
400TX in rodinal 1+50
CrisR
Well-known
redisburning
Well-known
hmm I think I might be channeling new forum mod (congrats!) Helen here as Ive basically waivered back into not selling. one thing is for sure, Im done shooting tri-x. I think my recent lapse in faith has come from a failure to separate the lens from my film/developing/scanning.
rather than look at scans, I went ahead and put my loupe on some negatives where I took test shots to compare my ZM50P against my beloved Zuiko 50/3.5 macro. Now that Zuiko is no slouch and can run with some of the best of them. It also has a super cool drawing style and it showed a 55/3.5 Nikkor who the boss was when I compared them head to head both on digital and on film. It also may have been demolished by one Zeiss planar. As in the Zeiss at f2.8 was better than the Zuiko at 5.6. well at least in the center 2/3rds which is where I had stuff in focus.
At any rate Im going to go back to 100 iso film and put some money into upgrading my film scanner or something.
here is one on acros.

Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
rather than look at scans, I went ahead and put my loupe on some negatives where I took test shots to compare my ZM50P against my beloved Zuiko 50/3.5 macro. Now that Zuiko is no slouch and can run with some of the best of them. It also has a super cool drawing style and it showed a 55/3.5 Nikkor who the boss was when I compared them head to head both on digital and on film. It also may have been demolished by one Zeiss planar. As in the Zeiss at f2.8 was better than the Zuiko at 5.6. well at least in the center 2/3rds which is where I had stuff in focus.
At any rate Im going to go back to 100 iso film and put some money into upgrading my film scanner or something.
here is one on acros.

Untitled by redisburning, on Flickr
filmtwit
Desperate but not serious
Sounds like you have the wrong Sonnar.
the 50mm f1.4 Nikkor-sc (sonnar design) goes to 0.7meters with minimum effort.
Most recent on the 50 planar
the 50mm f1.4 Nikkor-sc (sonnar design) goes to 0.7meters with minimum effort.
I'm glad to. the 0.7 minimum focus distance is really important on the planar btw. that's why I use planar allmost all the time. sonnar is waiting for only the right moments.
Most recent on the 50 planar

Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.