CV Nokton 35/1.4 vs. 40/1.4

kossi008

Photon Counter
Local time
9:53 AM
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
929
Location
Berlin, Germany
It's me again, back with another stupid question...

I am looking for a compact, fast 35 or 40 mm lens to take along for night shooting in cafes, bars etc. to complement my brilliant but somewhat slowish C-Biogon 35/2.8.

So I am torn between the 35/1.4 and the 40/1.4. The latter would intrigue me as I would not simply be replicating an existing focal length, but adding something. On the other hand, I am wondering about guessing the framing. (I know, I shouldn't, after guessing the 28 on the Bessa R for so long).

In the end, it really boils down to image quality. So, those of you who have both lenses: Which is sharper? Which has the nicer bokeh (no, I'm not considering the 35/1.2)? And which has less distortions?
 
The 35/1.4 is very good. A bit more distortion and nicer bokeh than the 40. The distortion has never bothered me, it's not worse than that of other lenses, like for example UC Hexanon and 35/1.2 Nokton.

I stopped using the 40, too many over-cropped shots on my Leicas, at close focus mostly. It's a little longer than 40, maybe 43 or so. Look at the 40 this way: it's a slightly wider 50, in relation to 50, much like 28 to 35.

Roland.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the insight, guys, I've ordered a 35/1.4 SC for that classic look in low-light situations. I still have the C-Biogon if I need tack sharp... 😀
 
Back
Top Bottom