retinax
Well-known
I think it's all been said, delta 400 doesn't have the resolution of tmy-2, and if you don't have any specific reasons, might as well to for what's cheaper.
If like to hear your thoughts about why you want a straight curve for gloomy winter skies. Are you prepared to do a lot of burning the skies in? Because IMHO that's the main thing with straight lines, they give you lots of material for dodging and burning, but you have to dodge and burn more than with an s-curve or you get the flat looking mid tones that some complain about with the designer grain films. Because the very highlights and deep shadows simply end up further away from the mid tones on the curve, and to get them all on paper without much d&b will require a softer grade, compared to a film with an s-curve.
I think (no densitomer, just theory and casual observation) I can bend the curve down in the highlights with dilute developer and reduced agitation though, so these films are very flexible.
If like to hear your thoughts about why you want a straight curve for gloomy winter skies. Are you prepared to do a lot of burning the skies in? Because IMHO that's the main thing with straight lines, they give you lots of material for dodging and burning, but you have to dodge and burn more than with an s-curve or you get the flat looking mid tones that some complain about with the designer grain films. Because the very highlights and deep shadows simply end up further away from the mid tones on the curve, and to get them all on paper without much d&b will require a softer grade, compared to a film with an s-curve.
I think (no densitomer, just theory and casual observation) I can bend the curve down in the highlights with dilute developer and reduced agitation though, so these films are very flexible.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Are you prepared to do a lot of burning the skies in? Because IMHO that's the main thing with straight lines, they give you lots of material for dodging and burning, but you have to dodge and burn more than with an s-curve or you get the flat looking mid tones that some complain about with the designer grain films.
Split grade printing. No burning or dodging necessary. Invented in the fifties by Pictorial Service in Paris.
There should be a possibility in Photoshop to create split grade printing digitally. Maybe it exists, I don't know. I do it with the Ilford filters 00 and 5 on Adox MCC 110 paper.
To get a digital file I simply scan the print.
Erik.
nickthetasmaniac
Veteran
Probably because Kodak sells tmax to dealers cheaper than CR Kennedy sells Delta.
Not that hard to figure out
Thank you for the insight.
Solinar
Analog Preferred
Whoa - I didn't know that a roll of 135-36 black and white film is currently almost $13.00 USD in Australia. You all have my condolences.
My advise, try a couple rolls of TMY-2. Then see if you like it.
My advise, try a couple rolls of TMY-2. Then see if you like it.
retinax
Well-known
Split grade printing. No burning or dodging necessary. Invented in the fifties by Pictorial Service in Paris.
There should be a possibility in Photoshop to create split grade printing digitally. Maybe it exists, I don't know. I do it with the Ilford filters 00 and 5 on Adox MCC 110 paper.
To get a digital file I simply scan the print.
Erik.
Yes I think when split-grade printing, the soft exposure makes sure that no highlights get blown. Pre-flashing the paper is another useful tool in the box here. Both comes at the expense of soft contrast in the highlights, how else, the excess contrast needs to go somewhere. A film/dev regime with stronger highlight roll-off has that built in, but burning in from these negs will only allow you to bring the soft contrast from the shoulder down to printable range. If one wants more contrast in the highlights and/or the burnt in areas, dodging and burning from a straight line negative it is.
nickthetasmaniac
Veteran
Whoa - I didn't know that a roll of 135-36 black and white film is currently almost $13.00 USD in Australia. You all have my condolences.
It isn't?
Currently in Aus Delta400 is $7.45usd and Tmax400 $6.45usd (depending where you shop)...
Tim Gray
Well-known
Not really used a lot of Delta. Have use a bit of Tri-X. While it does have its place, I think TMY-2 is probably the best B&W film ever.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Yes I think when split-grade printing, the soft exposure makes sure that no highlights get blown. Pre-flashing the paper is another useful tool in the box here. Both comes at the expense of soft contrast in the highlights, how else, the excess contrast needs to go somewhere. A film/dev regime with stronger highlight roll-off has that built in, but burning in from these negs will only allow you to bring the soft contrast from the shoulder down to printable range. If one wants more contrast in the highlights and/or the burnt in areas, dodging and burning from a straight line negative it is.
There are so many possibilities with split grade printing, you can burn in the high lights with the hard filter if you like. There is no end to it. Fascinating, really.
Erik.
Ccoppola82
Well-known
I actually started using split grade printing after I got a Bessemer universal 45 w VC controller for dirt cheap. Lambrechts book also has good sections on contrast control. The VC controller makes it very simple and easy to fine tune because I can dial in ANY grade in .1 increments if I want to.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
I actually started using split grade printing after I got a Bessemer universal 45 w VC controller for dirt cheap. Lambrechts book also has good sections on contrast control. The VC controller makes it very simple and easy to fine tune because I can dial in ANY grade in .1 increments if I want to.
Yes, but you only need two filters: 00 and 5. There are two exposures, usually a long one with the 00 to control the highlights and a short one with the 5 to determine the deep blacks. This way of printing needs a lot of test exposures, but is very rewarding because you can get a professional quality print of practically every negative, old or new and good or bad.
Erik.

olifaunt
Well-known
Whoa - I didn't know that a roll of 135-36 black and white film is currently almost $13.00 USD in Australia. You all have my condolences.
I recently traveled to Australia and ran out of film. Prices were so astronomical I couldn't afford to buy Tri-X there. I ended up getting some rolls of 24 Kodak Gold just to have something to shoot with but I think even that was about double what 36 Portra 400 would cost me here.
nickthetasmaniac
Veteran
I recently traveled to Australia and ran out of film. Prices were so astronomical I couldn't afford to buy Tri-X there. I ended up getting some rolls of 24 Kodak Gold just to have something to shoot with but I think even that was about double what 36 Portra 400 would cost me here.
There's considerable difference in prices in Aus depending where you shop. The best (legitimate) Australian online stores have prices a little higher but comparable to the US. But if you walk into a Camera House on main street you'll easily find yourself paying $20aud for a roll of Portra
james.liam
Well-known
@ B&H:
TMax 400: $5.80
Delta 400: $7.50
TMax 400: $5.80
Delta 400: $7.50
dourbalistar
Buy more film
@ B&H:
TMax 400: $5.80
Delta 400: $7.50
Oddly enough, the prices for a 100-foot roll are reversed:
T-Max 400: $129.95
Delta 400: $79.99
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.