rfaspen
[insert pithy phrase here]
FWIW, I just finished scanning a few 35mm negatives with both my Konica-Minolta Dual-Scan IV, and my Leica M240 on the BEOON. The dedicated Dual-Scan IV edged out the camera scans in resolution -- very odd. I don't think its a function of the grain being picked up and accentuated, but I guess it could be. The digital camera scans edged out the film scanner in terms of tonality. Both methods have enough quirks to be time-consuming.
Anyway, I guess I'm confused and not sure which of these to continue with. For MF negs, the choice is much easier as my only option for MF is the digital camera route.
A first-world problem to be sure.
Anyway, I guess I'm confused and not sure which of these to continue with. For MF negs, the choice is much easier as my only option for MF is the digital camera route.
A first-world problem to be sure.