Uh no. Go brush up on the bill of rights and how we got here.
Wow man, that's a really condescending remark.
@Edward,
I see from the information listed under your screen name that you are currently located in Bangkok. This makes me wonder if you have always lived there, and if you have ever lived in the U.S. If you have never lived in the U.S. and are not a U.S. citizen, it is understandable that your knowledge of the U.S. Bill of Rights is naturally limited. As a U.S. citizen, I am decidedly not up to speed on the rights of Thai citizens.
Here in the U.S., citizens have the right to photograph others in the public domain without restriction or interference, police officers included. This is not a new development - it has been that way since December, 1791 when the Bill of Rights was ratified. Court rulings have affirmed this in recent years. The right to photograph private citizens and public officials - including law enforcement people - is a right that is guaranteed under the Fist Amendment (freedom of the press and freedom of expression).
The Fourth Amendment guarantees the U.S. citizen freedom from unreasonable search and seizure of their property. The Fifth Amendment guarantees that the citizen will not be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.
Regarding the situation that took place in Detroit - based on the information we know at present - the police officers in question flagrantly violated at minimum Articles One, Four and Five of the U.S. Bill of Rights - and also possibly other provisions of the Bill of Rights. These are unlawful acts committed by the police - who have sworn an oath to support, protect and defend the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the laws they themselves violated in their laying siege to and unlawfully arresting this reporter.
When the police break the law, their violations of the law cannot and must not go unchallenged by the victim of their unlawful acts.
One thing that recent history has taught us here in the U.S. is that at best, we must always view the activities of politicians and the police with wary skepticism. The phrase
"Trust but verify" comes to mind. At worst, we cannot turn our backs on politicians or the police; trusting either group has proven to be a fool's errand.
Politicians and police, left to their own devices, will resort to, shall we say,
"unwholesome, egocentric, unjust, exasperating and potentially dangerous" behavior in much the same way that a group of unsupervised preschoolers will. Like preschoolers, they require vigilant monitoring, structured boundaries, consistent restraint and a firm hand. The duty of the citizenry is to provide those things, and to apply appropriate discipline via the legal process when police officers act in an inappropriate and unlawful manner.
For the citizens to do any less is to invite extremely troubling results.