john neal
fallor ergo sum
I have always lusted after a pre-asph 35mm 'cron for my MP and I just managed to swap my mint 35mm f1.5 Canon ltm lens for a nice condition 1992 M 35mm f2 'cron in black.
I know the quality that the Canon lens elivered was great (if a little odd in the corners), but should the 'cron be better? I understand the date makes it a 4th version, which is supposed to have great bokeh, but can anyone give me a little reassurance? OK, I know I cannot use the new lens on my IIIa, but I have a Jupiter for 35mm on that body.
Please, tell me I did the right thing............
I know the quality that the Canon lens elivered was great (if a little odd in the corners), but should the 'cron be better? I understand the date makes it a 4th version, which is supposed to have great bokeh, but can anyone give me a little reassurance? OK, I know I cannot use the new lens on my IIIa, but I have a Jupiter for 35mm on that body.
Please, tell me I did the right thing............
Last edited: