TXForester
Well-known
If this where cinematography instead of still photography, you'd have to throw in bad music and bad dialog and almost no plot.nahhh...
bad lighting - porn
If this where cinematography instead of still photography, you'd have to throw in bad music and bad dialog and almost no plot.nahhh...
bad lighting - porn
There is no difference between nude or naked if your intentions are the same.
I suggest photographing your girlfriend for your first nude sets. You will objectify her less and the love and protection of her modesty will show in the images.
Otherwise it is nearly impossible to expect a young man to do a 1st nude shoot that exhibits no sign of objectification.
On the other hand objectification does not always exclude artistic expression.
Why shoot nude anyway?
I end up with nudity in a couple shoots per month but it's never my choice rather.... always the models act of expression or frustration or joy etc..
Maybe you should just jump in and get some experience rather than plan for something.
Find a model who needs work to fill up her portfolio. See what sort of exchange you are capable of building.
There is nothing worse than having a model go stiff unless it's one who has no clothes on 😉
So, are Lee Friedlander's "nudes" naked or nude?
no I just didin't want to hurry into doing it carelessly...
In RFF we have a lot of different expert shooters and I always like to get advice from people who have done it before in the past and possibly learn a few things that they have learnt from their experience in the subject.
sorry for being inexperienced and not arrogant.
Sorry if I come off as arrogant. But to me your just asking what the difference is between artistic nudes and porn. I've never done nudes, but even I know the difference. The best cure for inexperience is to take your photos and post them. That way the members that can help will have something to go by. Jump in with both feet. We only learn from our mistakes.
So, are Lee Friedlander's "nudes" naked or nude?
Dennis,
I can't really help with the philosophy behind your question, although I will comment that jbrubakers comment on form is pretty interesting.
I can offer sources of inspiration:
http://www.zamario.com/ - followed him for years, really dig his style.
Bill Brandt
http://www.jeanloupsieff.com/ - one of the greats
Someone mentioned Frank's work. Frank has his own style, which I can respect, but it seems like he flips out once a month when he realizes that hes just another average in a sea of talent.
I wrote a paper about this in college (art history class). As best as I remember: Nude is all about form - naked is about being stripped of clothing. Nude appears comfortable - naked is self conscious or ashamed. You might want study how the nude form has been portrayed in art, not just photography. ---john.
Dennis
Do you see any conflict in apparently not wanting to do a "porn" shoot and objectify a woman's body and your genius plan to hire an escort?
Oh let me answer that... Yes, I do.
WTF dude?