Digital Black and White.

U82040.1732395141.0.jpg



U82040.1732395174.0.jpg



U82040.1732395188.0.jpg



M8 | Summicron-C 40 f2
 
Love this picture....
I shot a bit of black and white (nearly always Tri-X or Plus-X) from about 1970 on. In 2006 I started the transition to digital. Held on to an M6 TTL for a long time but eventually surrendered to Nikon, Canon, and Fuji's offerings. The neat thing about B&W (film or digital) is that it reduces things to their concepts. Or the 'idea' of the things that are in the frame. Evidence for this might be simply that the 'real' world is not (usually) black and white. Going too far might risk becoming obsessed with rendering, sharpness, tonal gradients, etc.. Becoming too obsessed with the form. Yes, the form should be of sufficient quality to not distract, but it is the content, and the ideas (concepts?) implied by the content that should trump form.

polaris shoots robot BW 2.JPG
 
Love this picture....
I shot a bit of black and white (nearly always Tri-X or Plus-X) from about 1970 on. In 2006 I started the transition to digital. Held on to an M6 TTL for a long time but eventually surrendered to Nikon, Canon, and Fuji's offerings. The neat thing about B&W (film or digital) is that it reduces things to their concepts. Or the 'idea' of the things that are in the frame. Evidence for this might be simply that the 'real' world is not (usually) black and white. Going too far might risk becoming obsessed with rendering, sharpness, tonal gradients, etc.. Becoming too obsessed with the form. Yes, the form should be of sufficient quality to not distract, but it is the content, and the ideas (concepts?) implied by the content that should trump form.

View attachment 4849570
The more successful a photograph, the more inseparable "content" and "form" become. Ideally, there should be no dichotomy. IMHO, of course!
 
Still having fun with the Y600 kiddie camera with it's built-in thermal printer. Photo on left printed using "Dot" setting, and the one on the right using "Gray" setting. The two settings can produce results which are almost completely different, but I haven't figured out how to predict which setting will work best for a given photo, and some photos seem to produce lousy results no matter which settings I choose.
Leaves.jpg
 
Last edited:

Thread viewers

Back
Top Bottom