squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
I.........sort of almost want one
......The fact that it isn’t for us doesn’t mean we ought to crap on it.
14MP is far more reasonable, if that’s correct!
At 14mp and just over $100... I don't see the harm anymore. At 1.4mp, I was wondering who want it.
Of course we all want that elusive digital rangefinder not made by Leica, but it just isn't realistic to expect it to be made. I expected a toy camera, and that is what it is.
I was hoping for a lower-tech camera that would give us a low cost Fuji X100 with a pure optical RF and manual controls.
Used X100 cameras are now about $300, how much more low cost do you want? 🙂I was hoping for a lower-tech camera that would give us a low cost Fuji X100 with a pure optical RF and manual controls.
You're right, priced reasonably for what it is. It will appeal to lots of 20-somethings.
B2 (;->
Used X100 cameras are now about $300, how much more low cost do you want? 🙂
...One thing seems sure..... The Yashica name has some drawing power still.
If these cats wanted to produce a real camera, the brand seems strong.
Don't get it. Is this a fixed 2.8 aperture? Only 5 speeds? I could get the idea of digifilm if that were also your memory carriers (they could put a µsd in it). But a proposed now, I don't get it. Probably getting too old. Oh well, got a Minister D, TL electro X and an EM if I want to use a Yashica.
I expected it would be those chinese that brought out a Kodak (was it, don't remember 100%) m34 out some time ago.
Again, why kickstarter? Yashica is owned by a huge company who obviously don't have any faith in their ideas. I suppose if they invest nothing themselves then it doesn't hurt to bin the concept next year.
Why would anyone want all the downsides of film (fixed ISO, colour or B&W but not both) with none of the benefits like a film image? It's like coupling the worst of both worlds.
In a world of Konosts, I'll respect them for just bringing their product to market.