Dilemma

pepeguitarra

Well-known
Local time
7:32 AM
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
817
Location
Los Angeles, California
If you already have the Summicron 50/2 Collapsible, and you also have the choice to buy: a) Summicron 50/2 rigid (around $900), and b) Summicron 50/2 (IV) (around $1,500), which one would you buy and why?

Thanks, Pepe
 
I had a 50 cron collapsable that was in very good shape (no cleaning marks on front or rear elements), but I didn't find it to be quite sharp enough for my liking. It did have a wonderful level of contrast when shooting it with B&W film. Back when I still had my M8, Leica was telling folks not to use the collapsable 50 cron on the M8 cameras because of a fear of the back of the lens contacting the sensor glass.

I eventually sold it and purchased a 50 Cron current version, before they were doing six bit coding, so probably from the late 1990's. I LOVE the new lens and don't regret selling the collapsable one for this one. Contrast is higher, but still very beautiful with B&W and not at all bad with color, and the little thing is sharp as a tack.
 
Cron 50mm IV is absolutely fantastic lens (used to have one for a year or so), but I would never buy it for 1500 - its just to "regular" price. Take your time and you will get one from ebay for 1000 or little less. Around 2 weeks ago there was one in great condition, on ebay, just for little more than 900 usd.
Also you can try to find nice Cron 50mm III, which I personally found superb. Can't even say - which one is better III or IV. Type III Cron is probably the one of the most underrated lens, what you can buy used. Steal deal)
 
Back
Top Bottom