Dmitry Medvedev and Leica (again)

[J J Kapsberger]

My guess it's an M9: http://www.economist.com/node/17416862?story_id=17416862

In the print edition, there's a discernible red smudge where the dot would be. It's not so apparent in the online photo (at least on my monitor).

Would that be a Noctilux?

 

[smile]

yep, he uses leica m9 and noctilux /0.95

http://www.sakhalin.info/weekly/65171/

 

[Olsen]

That is the 'old' type of Noctilux, the same as I have. On his visit to Oslo earlier this year he seems to be using a Canon D5.

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86758&page=2

 

[smile]

That is the 'old' type of Noctilux, the same as I have.

but he's got an aspherical too, he also uses s2 sometimes

 

[sanmich]

http://www.sakhalin.info/weekly/65171/

hyperfocal focusing with a Noct at full bore eh?

 

[smile]

hyperfocal focusing with a Noct at full bore eh?

probably he doesn't know it is manual)

 

[ZorkiKat]

hyperfocal focusing with a Noct at full bore eh?

A carry-over from his days with the Smena-8M?

 

[Rico]

On his visit to Oslo earlier this year he seems to be using a Canon D5.

He wanted to use the 5D, but Putin said Leica.

 

[tomalophicon]

More importantly, there looks to be a Land Rover Discovery in the back!

 

[robklurfield]

hard to believe that there was a time when we used to care who was standing, in which order, atop the Kremlin wall. now, we only worry about which version of the Noct he's got and whether he knows how to (or whether he knows he needs to) focus. times change.

 

[Roger Hicks]

hard to believe that there was a time when we used to care who was standing, in which order, atop the Kremlin wall. now, we only worry about which version of the Noct he's got and whether he knows how to (or whether he knows he needs to) focus. times change.

Dear Rob,

Yes. This is better, isn't it?

But I can't believe the people who are saying 'does he know it's not automatic?'.

At the risk of turning this into a political thread, I can think of one or two politicians who might conceivably be that stupid, but they're not Russian. It seems far likelier to me that anyone who is seen more than once with an M9 and Noctilux may possibly be a keen photographer.

Wouldn't it be fun if he started a thread on RFF? Perhaps we should send him an official invitation.

Cheers,

R.

 

[Roger Hicks]

More importantly, there looks to be a Land Rover Discovery in the back!

No, I think it's a tank...

Cheers,

R.

 

[QUAsit]

Technically it is not exactly tank, this is abandoned gun-turret from T-54 M1949 on the coast artillery guard post.

 

[isorgb]

No, I think it's a tank...

Cheers,

R.

(ten characters)

 

[smile]

Dear Rob,

Yes. This is better, isn't it?

But I can't believe the people who are saying 'does he know it's not automatic?'.

At the risk of turning this into a political thread, I can think of one or two politicians who might conceivably be that stupid, but they're not Russian. It seems far likelier to me that anyone who is seen more than once with an M9 and Noctilux may possibly be a keen photographer.

Wouldn't it be fun if he started a thread on RFF? Perhaps we should send him an official invitation.

Cheers,

R.

it's so touching

hard to believe that there was a time when we used to care who was standing, in which order, atop the Kremlin wall. now, we only worry about which version of the Noct he's got and whether he knows how to (or whether he knows he needs to) focus. times change.

who we? this is a photography forum not political, so let's discuss which version of noctilux he's got
ps: time is not exist