emraphoto
Veteran
I know we are all really gear oriented around here and biased toward RF's, but it's really pretty simple with this thread. There is a reason all those PJ's standing around at an event are shooting Nikon and Canon DSLR's with big zoom lenses. You can take a look at them, say to yourself "what idiots hauling around all those porky DSLR's and two pound zoom lenses," or you can decide maybe they know something about their day to day work you don't.
If you can find someone to commission you to do month long photo essays anymore, then you can use just about any camera you want. But there aren't many of those commissions left, I'm afraid.
some of the folks advocating a different approach have spent a great amount of time in that world and know a great deal about it.
trying to find commissions to shoot in depth documentary work is indeed difficult. it is doubly difficult if you don't have a signature of your own. breaking into the news wire or daily spot news is next to bloody impossible if you don't have an inside track.
i have spent countless hours at the press events where the white lens crowds show up in herds. one climbs up on stage behind the politician with his fist in the air and the rest of the heard promptly follows. one puts his super wide down at the feet of the politician with his fist in the air and points up, sure enough the rest of the pack follows. they're like a flock of starlings and the images showing up in the press the next am will demonstrate it. because they are all carrying the same gear says to me "find a different path". i am not trying to be rude, i just know the scene well.
you can choose your own path. but do not overlook following your own. if you think you produce good work with rangefinder and want an r-d1 then get one. get two and when you can get a third. follow you're own route and produce work with a distinctive vision. if you're good and reliable people will notice.