Cyriljay
Leica Like
An interesting analysis.
1) Cropping - Utterly indifferent. For me, there are only two reasons not to crop. One is that the composition is fine in the frame as it stands, which obviously is what I always try to achieve. The other is that the less you enlarge, the better the technical quality.
2) Zoom lenses - Really don't like 'em. A terrible waste of time. The time you spend fine-tuning the framing is often plenty long enough to lose the composition. Much better to use a prime, and either grab and shoot, or (if there's time) move to the right position. OK for record shots and happy snaps. EDIT, in light of Souljer's post below: also too slow.
3) Autofocus - Works most of the time. When it doesn't -- aargh! I don't like 'aargh', hence a preference for manual focus.
4) Digital - OK with the right camera. Instead of slides in an MP, I now shoot colour with an M9, but for b+w I prefer film. The thing is, I don't like big, modern, lardy film SLRs and more than I like big, modern, lardy DSLRs
5) Photoshop - It's a 'digital darkroom', just the same way that my real darkroom is, well, a real darkroom.
Cheers,
R.
Evrything as Roger says
It is logic when you have your photos right in composition and the rest Zero cropping. I have Xpan Square format Hasselblad and a M8.2 which seems to be several ratios and formats . I can't remember when cropped my photo last except once when I wanted to perceive that one photo and yes It looks great and it is within all the other formats and looks unique. So it proves that cropping is not bad and can be useful. so again if I happen to use cropping i'll do it.😀
