Fedzilla_Bob
man with cat
When it comes to resolution - size does matter (we need a "poker face" icon)
Fedzilla_Bob said:When it comes to resolution - size does matter (we need a "poker face" icon)
kmack said:No it's not the quality of the gear, It's the size of your negatives that count 😀
gabrielma said:Careful, now: if good food were demonstrably superior, it would have remained the food of choice for professional food eaters ...
Iskra 2 said:I agree kmack, my Iskra 2 beats any of these puny small format things. She grins 😛 everytime she's out and about with them. 😀 :angel: Regards. Peace. :angel: :angel:
doubs43 said:I have an Iskra I and an Iskra II. They take fine pictures as the image below, taken with the Iskra II, will show but they aren't ideal for all situations. The smaller format interchangeable lens RF camera is more flexible and can be a better choice in some circumstamces.
Walker
jan normandale said:Attention puny 35mm RF and 6x6 RF users , this is an elite (not snob, they don't have the goods only the attitude, where Elitists have it all) Fuji G690 BL speaking.. line up behind me please.
signed the "FUJI-Nator"
;-D
MCTuomey said:Yes, it does, BUT only when one confuses the quality of equipment with the quality of its owner.
I believe this is one of the grand logical fallacies of modern consumerism: that one who owns magnificent things is therefore magnificent as well.
The qualities of a thing and the qualities of the owner of a thing are of course independent events.
Iskra 2 said:Come on doubs43, this is about snobbery 😀 and my Iskra 2 is a real snob around SF stuff. 🙂 She doesn't care about anything less than 20x30 prints on the wall. I'll bet your Iskras feel the same way.
Sometimes I think she's less a snob and more a s#ut when she drops her leather cover and shows off her red undercover. 😛 😀 Regards. :angel: Peace. :angel: :angel:
THE END
If you want to compare an espresso machine with an Italian percolator, knock yourself out. I wouldn't compare a Snap-On adjustable wrench with a Craftsman monkey wrench. Some people may be talented enough to do the same things with both tools, but I wouldn't be comparing both on use and price.RJBender said:Just for grins I checked the MSRP on the following cameras published in the December 1968 annual camera review issue of Modern Photography.
Nikon F Photomic Tn (with built in meter) and 50mm f/1.4 $443
Leica M4 with 50mm f/1.4 Summilux $501
The M4 was only 13% more than the Nikon.
Fedzilla_Bob said:I think Kong needs a down vest.
doubs43 said:Sir, I humbly bow to your superior and ultimately snobbish Iskra II. Now that you mention it, there is a certain attitude displayed by my Iskras that I couldn't quite place but snobbish could be it. I shall now fall silent where the smaller format is concerned. 😉
BUT..... there is the matter of my 4x5 Speed Graphic which can humble 6x9 easily enough. 😀
Walker
Originally Posted by RJBender
Just for grins I checked the MSRP on the following cameras published in the December 1968 annual camera review issue of Modern Photography.
Nikon F Photomic Tn (with built in meter) and 50mm f/1.4 $443
Leica M4 with 50mm f/1.4 Summilux $501
The M4 was only 13% more than the Nikon.
gabrielma said:If you want to compare an espresso machine with an Italian percolator, knock yourself out. I wouldn't compare a Snap-On adjustable wrench with a Craftsman monkey wrench. Some people may be talented enough to do the same things with both tools, but I wouldn't be comparing both on use and price.
Besides, one's Bob Vila may be a Robert Capa's snob, and viceversa 😉