pvdhaar
Peter
When using different SD cards (Sandisk Ultra 2GB-15MB/s and 8GB-30MB/s), I get the distinct impression that the NEX-6 starts up faster with the smaller 2GB cards despite the slower transfer rate. The difference isn't exactly overwhelming.. and I've no (access to) two identical cameras/lenses to compare them side by side, so it's impression only for now.
What I've already figured out, is that the 2GB cards can be read on both the SD card slot on my monitor and my PC, and shows up as file-system FAT. The 8GB card on the other hand doesn't register on the monitor, and shows up as file-system FAT32 on the slot on the PC. It's like the camera needs to think a tad longer about the bigger file allocation table causing a diff in start-up time.
So the real question is, am I imagining things or do others notice this as well? And the ultimate luxury question: is anyone able to do a side by side comparison?
What I've already figured out, is that the 2GB cards can be read on both the SD card slot on my monitor and my PC, and shows up as file-system FAT. The 8GB card on the other hand doesn't register on the monitor, and shows up as file-system FAT32 on the slot on the PC. It's like the camera needs to think a tad longer about the bigger file allocation table causing a diff in start-up time.
So the real question is, am I imagining things or do others notice this as well? And the ultimate luxury question: is anyone able to do a side by side comparison?