kiemchacsu
Well-known
I have both. Basically RF for my self and sometimes family, DSLR for kids/friends...
do many of you folks shoot with a combined kit of rf and dslr/slr?
i was thinking of carrying an rd1 with the tiny 50...along with the d90 and 24/85 combo...of course i could just add the 50 to the d90 kit but...
This is why I went back to film. I couldn't afford the quality hit of a small DSLR in my work, so I use a big one at work, and small film cameras on my own, where the level of fine detail doesn't matter. However, in the last year or two the quality of small cameras seems to be going up, and I'm getting interested in them. . . . . but I just saw some images from the new Nikon D800e, and the additional quality it offers is certainly enticing.i guess i'm more of an either/or not both guy. i'm beginning to consider letting the rf gear go in favor of dslr use. getting tired of compromising the flexibility of my dslrs in favor of size/weight.
![]()
SLR for tele, RF for wide to norm, at least in the '70s.
.
i have to admit that my thinking on this comes from a very selfish position...i normally keep saturdays open for shooting...i start off with an early b'fast with friends and then head off to the market and beyond for shooting. so, every week there is the decision as to what to bring along. it used to be which lenses were the big choice but now it's what camera and which lenses. being a kid at heart, i want to shoot both the dslr and the rf and i'm looking to see how that could happen easily.
as i stated in the original post, maybe a rf with 50 and the nikon with the my 2 new to me lenses, the 24 and 85...keeps me covered and i get to use both systems without much real hassle.
i wonder if others have this sort of decision making process on the go as well?
This is why I went back to film. I couldn't afford the quality hit of a small DSLR in my work, so I use a big one at work, and small film cameras on my own, where the level of fine detail doesn't matter.