Is that really so incredible? They're an unorthodox design, no question, but definitely a quality camera. I suspect their biggest problems are a lack of maintenance (the original model lends itself to the ingress of dust etc) and maybe being tampered with by people who don't have the patience to learn their quirks. I've got a couple working well. I'd rather work on a Vitessa than a Minolta or Pentax SLR, for example. But I'm increasingly relieved I'm not attracted to Leicas. These sorts of threads (Where is my camera?/xxx isn't responding to contact/How long is so-and-so taking, these days?/My camera just came back from xxx and it's not working right--etc.) are all too frequent across the web, and they are, frankly, a real turn off.Indeed, I lamented their passing. I own no Leicas but used them for a Rolleiflex and, incredibly, they also got a Voigtländer Vitessa working again for me. Just a few days ago I was thinking of trying to find and contact Shi Kim to ask where their repairmen landed, in hopes that some might be working somewhere else. Does anyone know how many staff they had? Since we always said "Essex Camera" rather than an individual's name, it felt like there might have been a roomful of them and Shi was just dispatcher; but for all I really know, maybe it was just Shi himself.
--Dave
Cheers,
Brett