RedLion
Come to the Faire
Don't know the date of this article, but I assume many have already seen this...
Everything Old is New Again.
and this one:
Zen of Film Vs. Digital Gratification
Joe
Everything Old is New Again.
and this one:
Zen of Film Vs. Digital Gratification
Joe
Last edited:
furcafe
Veteran
JustCallMeBronica
Newbie
Oooh, thank you for these. I want to reflect some more on them, but this (from the "Zen" article) is something I think a lot about: "Mulling it over, I couldn’t articulate it fully but definitely, I knew I had become lazy, really lazy. A spectacular sloth by the standards of shooting film."
FrankS
Registered User
Most of you know I think along these same lines, but it is a film vs digital topic, so it needs to be moved to the appropriate forum which is not visible on the main page of newest posts, because of its contentious nature. Please continue with this here.
In the Kirk Tuck blog, Everything Old is New Again, these lines stood out to me: "(with digital) The shooting goes faster but the burden on the back end grows exponentially and the clients rarely see the hours that go into color correction, retouching and archiving of these images. If they don’t see it they don’t value it."
He presents a balanced assessment IMO, and he is certainly qualified to state an opinion.
In the Kirk Tuck blog, Everything Old is New Again, these lines stood out to me: "(with digital) The shooting goes faster but the burden on the back end grows exponentially and the clients rarely see the hours that go into color correction, retouching and archiving of these images. If they don’t see it they don’t value it."
He presents a balanced assessment IMO, and he is certainly qualified to state an opinion.
Last edited: