Most of you know I think along these same lines, but it is a film vs digital topic, so it needs to be moved to the appropriate forum which is not visible on the main page of newest posts, because of its contentious nature. Please continue with this here.
In the Kirk Tuck blog, Everything Old is New Again, these lines stood out to me: "(with digital) The shooting goes faster but the burden on the back end grows exponentially and the clients rarely see the hours that go into color correction, retouching and archiving of these images. If they don’t see it they don’t value it."
He presents a balanced assessment IMO, and he is certainly qualified to state an opinion.
