oscroft
Veteran
I've had an R4a for a while now, and I've taken it around Asia a couple of times, mainly with a CV 21/4 on it. I love it.
I haven't had any film-registration problems.
The 21 frame will probably prove tricky for spec-wearers.
I don't much like using a 50 on it, but other people find it fine (I also don't like using a 90 on my Ms, and I think that might be a reasonable way to check - if you can happily use a 90 with a 0.72x VF or thereabouts, my guess is that you'd be fine with a 50 on an R4).
I mostly use CV 21/4 and 28/3.5 on it - they're small and don't block the VF much. I tried the CV hood on the 21, but it blocks so much of the VF that I found it unusable (but the little 21 is quite resistant to flare). I really want a coupled 25/4 too. I had the uncoupled version, which is great, but found it unusable on the R4A, not because of focus, but because without an RF cam the perspective-corrected VF frame is stuck at the close end of the focus range and is really inaccurate for infinity.
Some shots taken with R4a and CV 21/4...
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=93252
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=93251
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=93253
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=93250
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=74204
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=74201
That's about all I can think of (except that I have an R3a waiting for me in the UK when I get back, so my next trip out here might be with an R3a/R4a combo).
Not getting rid of my OM2 though (or my OM1). I also had the Sigma 21-35 for a while, and it's a surprisingly good lens - I really didn't expect a super-wide SLR zoom to be that good. I let it go though, because it's much bigger and bulkier than RF wide primes, and I've shifted my w/a photography almost completely to RFs now (In fact, the 21-35 and my Zuiko 21/3.5 were both sold as fund-raising for the R4a).
Hope my rambling was of some use 🙂
I haven't had any film-registration problems.
The 21 frame will probably prove tricky for spec-wearers.
I don't much like using a 50 on it, but other people find it fine (I also don't like using a 90 on my Ms, and I think that might be a reasonable way to check - if you can happily use a 90 with a 0.72x VF or thereabouts, my guess is that you'd be fine with a 50 on an R4).
I mostly use CV 21/4 and 28/3.5 on it - they're small and don't block the VF much. I tried the CV hood on the 21, but it blocks so much of the VF that I found it unusable (but the little 21 is quite resistant to flare). I really want a coupled 25/4 too. I had the uncoupled version, which is great, but found it unusable on the R4A, not because of focus, but because without an RF cam the perspective-corrected VF frame is stuck at the close end of the focus range and is really inaccurate for infinity.
Some shots taken with R4a and CV 21/4...
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=93252
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=93251
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=93253
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=93250
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=74204
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=74201
That's about all I can think of (except that I have an R3a waiting for me in the UK when I get back, so my next trip out here might be with an R3a/R4a combo).
Not getting rid of my OM2 though (or my OM1). I also had the Sigma 21-35 for a while, and it's a surprisingly good lens - I really didn't expect a super-wide SLR zoom to be that good. I let it go though, because it's much bigger and bulkier than RF wide primes, and I've shifted my w/a photography almost completely to RFs now (In fact, the 21-35 and my Zuiko 21/3.5 were both sold as fund-raising for the R4a).
Hope my rambling was of some use 🙂