qqphotos
Well-known
Well I've just split up a 400 foot roll of it so I'll be messing with it a bunch more if I can motivate myself.
For weeks I have been reading through all 110 pages and I am only halfway through this thread. Wow! 👍👍👍
The bad news is, on returning to using Eastman 5222 film, I need a little help in fine tuning my developing protocol. Yes, I know everyone has their own but it might be helpful if I can see where my current understanding is, both good and bad, for only a single one-shot developer, Ilford DD-X. Your input will save me a lot of time. Thanks in advance!😇
Here is where I am at the moment…
Developing Eastman 5222 XX (with Ilford DD-X)
EI = 250
Developer
Dilution: 1:4
Time: 6min. 30sec @ 70°F/21°F
Agitation: 6 inversions first 30 sec.
+ 2 inversions each min.
Stop Bath
Water only
Time: 2 minutes
Agitation: 6 inversions
Fixer
Ilford Rapid Fix
Dilution: 1:4
Time: 6 minutes
Agitation: 6 inversions first 30 sec
+2 inversions each min.
Wash
Water only
Agitation:
Fill Tank, 5 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 10 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 20 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 30 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 40 inversions and Dump
Rinse 5 minutes
Photo Flo
Dilution: 5ml / 500ml water
Time: 2 minutes
Agitation: 3 inversions first 30 sec.
Rinse.
Hang to dry.
This seems within range for DD-X, though you don't say how you're printing or scanning. Almost everything I shoot now ends up digitized using a sony mirrorless camera and macro lens - that pulls out almost any detectable density in thin areas of the film so I rate at box speed (250 for daylight) and don't worry much about shadow detail. I develop about the same as you're proposing, 7 minutes at 68F, and the negatives for me retain sufficient shadow detail without highlights becoming too difficult to deal with. The grain structure with DD-X looks the best among the developers I've tried. I think if I were printing with an enlarger I'd probably try for a bit more contrast in development.For weeks I have been reading through all 110 pages and I am only halfway through this thread. Wow! 👍👍👍
The bad news is, on returning to using Eastman 5222 film, I need a little help in fine tuning my developing protocol. Yes, I know everyone has their own but it might be helpful if I can see where my current understanding is, both good and bad, for only a single one-shot developer, Ilford DD-X. Your input will save me a lot of time. Thanks in advance!😇
Here is where I am at the moment…
Developing Eastman 5222 XX (with Ilford DD-X)
EI = 250
Developer
Dilution: 1:4
Time: 6min. 30sec @ 70°F/21°F
Agitation: 6 inversions first 30 sec.
+ 2 inversions each min.
Steve, these look great, thanks for posting. I will use this in the next roll!Here are a couple of sample photos made with Cinestill XX and developed using the procedure described above:
Lake Tahoe Dam by Steve Macfarlane, on Flickr
Pockets by Steve Macfarlane, on Flickr
Thanks, Dave. I used 1:4 dilution. I should add that I developed the film for 7 minutes.Steve, these look great, thanks for posting. I will use this in the next roll!
Btw, what developer dilution did you use?
Very useful information!If you’re interested in trying Xtol, Adox XT-3 is an improved Xtol substitute. I recommend it. I have n]o affiliation with Adox, just impressed with this product. You can get it in a 1L pouch too.
When you say 1:4 do you mean the recommendation on the package (one part concentrate plus four parts water) or are you modifying the dilution to one part concentrate to four parts total (which would be one part concentrate plus three parts water)? Sorry about being pedantic, but I want to keep experimenting with this and there's always the risk of misinterpreting dilutions.Thanks, Dave. I used 1:4 dilution. I should add that I developed the film for 7 minutes.
I should have written 1+4, which is more precise. I’m specifically referring to the dilution instructions in the DDX data sheet, which also provide dilution instructions at the 1+4 strength for tanks of different sizes.When you say 1:4 do you mean the recommendation on the package (one part concentrate plus four parts water) or are you modifying the dilution to one part concentrate to four parts total (which would be one part concentrate plus three parts water)? Sorry about being pedantic, but I want to keep experimenting with this and there's always the risk of misinterpreting dilutions.