arbib
Well-known
I use Kodak's BW400CN.....For convience and I like the way it scans from my commercial Lab...Low noise and great detal.. They scan at just above 3600x2400 Pixels...Equals a 9.5mp sensor.....for $8.00 HR Scan + $3.00 Develope only.
thomasw_ said:Overwhelmingly 75% of RFF users favour Ilford's HP5+ or Kodak's TriX. I wonder if it is based primarily on aesthetics? I had thought the results would be more evenly distributed and based more on the film price. My favourite 400 speed film
Bob Michaels said:$200 worth of film and $25 worth of chemistry always has a more positive impact on the quality of my work than any new lens or camera body, regardless of their cost.
nikola said:My fav is Ilford PAN400 (the one and only I have... once tried efke100)... never laid my eyes on that fancy trix nor neopan nor that cool rollei... or any other for that matter! 🙂
Seems reasonable to me. Adorama has it for $5.35/roll at the moment, much cheaper–for a change–by the 50-roll Pro Pack ($234, or $4.68/roll). More or less the same at B & H.haagen_dazs said:curious
price check
for a roll of xp2 36exposures at 4usd.
is that cheap or kind of expensive?
lewis44 said:![]()
I have to 2nd this. I use BW400CN mostly and find it to have great latitude and process C-41, means I can get it done fast and cheap. I develop Only @ my local processer and scan the film with a Nikon LS-5000. A nice film for scanners.
I shoot it @ 320 instead of 400 and really like the results.
i think i read somewhere that it is sold in the UK only??tedwhite said:Neopan 400CN is not listed in the Freestyle catalog. Where do you get this film?