Ferrania P30 B&W Film Thread

Mackinaw said:
Nice tones. What kind of agitation did you use?

Jim B.
Click to expand...

Jim,

In a Patterson tank, 5 gentle inversions to start then 5 gentle inversions every 30 seconds after that. This is not my usual agitation method, but was trying to mimic the Ferrania 'best practices' table, at least for now. For D76 1+1, they note 13 minutes with constant agitation in a Jobo, so this was my very rough approximation of that.
As others have noted, this film might not have the exposure latitude of some others, but I really like it. Wish I had bought 5 rolls instead of 3.
 
I'm another kickstarter member and received my five rolls of P30 recently. I'm going to try it out next week, starting with developing in HC 110 dil. h (one of my go-to developers). Although Ferrania recommends shooting the film at box speed, I may also try giving it a little extra exposure. Excited to try this film!
 
Bingley said:
......Although Ferrania recommends shooting the film at box speed, I may also try giving it a little extra exposure. Excited to try this film!
Click to expand...

I shot my first two rolls at an E.I. of 80, the next roll I'll be shooting at 50. I've been using D-76 1:1 as my developer, this next roll will be processed in Rodinal. Post your images once you shoot some.

Jim B.
 
Bingley said:
I'm another kickstarter member and received my five rolls of P30 recently. I'm going to try it out next week, starting with developing in HC 110 dil. h (one of my go-to developers). Although Ferrania recommends shooting the film at box speed, I may also try giving it a little extra exposure. Excited to try this film!
Click to expand...

B,

I tried shooting at 120 ISO and using Diafine to get a small push, but I would of done better at box speed (80 ISO), even with Diafine.

I want more of this film. P30 has an interesting rendering. The highlights billow nicely and the shadows are detailed. The lack of mids using Diafine tells me that it would like more exposure.

Cal
 
Calzone said:
B,

I tried shooting at 120 ISO and using Diafine to get a small push, but I would of done better at box speed (80 ISO), even with Diafine.

I want more of this film. P30 has an interesting rendering. The highlights billow nicely and the shadows are detailed. The lack of mids using Diafine tells me that it would like more exposure.

Cal
Click to expand...

Thanks for that post. Diafine is my other "go-to" developer. I'll shoot a roll at box speed and process in Diafine, to compare w/ the results using HC 110.
 
Please post shots of your negs on a light box if you can. That tells much more than a scan of a neg. also let us know what developer.

The results are looking encouraging but for us wet printers we need to see actual negatives. With scanning you can salvage a neg that won't print in the darkroom. Your images look like they are from good negs.
 
I shot another roll of P-30 yesterday. This time I used my old Canonflex (love that bottom-wind) along with a R35/2.5 and a R58/1.2 lenses. I used an incident light meter and shot the film at an E.I. of 50. I processed the film in D-76 1:1 for 13 minutes with continuous agitation using an old Beseler rotary processing motor that operates like a Jobo (sort of). At first glance the negs looked a little dense, buy they’re scanning just beautifully. No doubt they are much better than the E.I 80, straight D-76 pics I took last week. Here’s one from yesterday’s shoot.

P-30_test2b.jpg


Jim B.
 
Bingley said:
Thanks for that post. Diafine is my other "go-to" developer. I'll shoot a roll at box speed and process in Diafine, to compare w/ the results using HC 110.
Click to expand...

B,

Somehow I got a third roll of free P30 "Alpha" from Steve at the NYC Meet-Up. I loaded it in my Wetzlar M6 this morning and already shot 24 exposures at 80 ISO. I'll be dipping this roll in Diafine this Saturday.

I only do two inversions per minute, but I extend development 4+4 for added density for wet printing. This creates smaller grain and extends the compensating effect.

The two rolls I shot at 125 ISO had wonderful billowing highlights that were so smooth and dreamy. Nice shadow detail, but the mids were scooped. I expect at 80 ISO even more shadow detail an a heap of mids for a HDR film like effect. I like the results at 125 ISO, but I think 80 ISO will take a step more towards medium format tonality where the negative speaks in terms of the mids.

How crazy is that I am not an original supporter of the kick starter and already I somehow have recieved three rolls of P30 "Alpha" for free. LOL.

Cal
 
AJShepherd said:
Exposed at box speed and developed in R09 at 1:100 for 45 minutes as recommended by the PDF on their website.


Vintage look by Antony Shepherd, on Flickr


Controls by Antony Shepherd, on Flickr

Pretty happy with those, and looking forward to using the other rolls i got.
Click to expand...

AJ,

Wonderful.

Rodinol with slow speed films has killer tonality. I wonder with the stand development you used how profound was the compensating effect on the negative? Did you have to add much contrast in post?

I'm a wet printer...

Cal
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Mos6502
Ferrania P33, first roll, and some observations.
2 3
Replies
53
Views
6K
luuca
luuca
M
New, Improved Polaroid B&W Film now Available
Replies
14
Views
2K
Oren Grad
O
J
  • Article Article
The Rise, Fall, and Resurrection of the 110 Format By 2009, 110 was kaput. Lomography brought it back! Part 2: A selection of fascinating 110 cameras.
2 3
Replies
41
Views
3K
Timmyjoe
Timmyjoe
J
  • Article Article
The Pentax Papers, Part 3, from the Super A of 1983 to the *ist of 2003: great shooters often overlooked.
Replies
11
Views
2K
ChrisPlatt
ChrisPlatt
J
  • Article Article
The Pentax Papers, part 2, K-mount 35mm SLRs, 1975 to 1980. From the first K-mount K2 to the magnificent pro caliber Pentax LX
2 3
Replies
47
Views
4K
Archiver
A
Back
Top Bottom