P30 exposed at 80 with an M5 semi-stand developed with Rodinal
Thanks. It demonstrates the problems of P30.
The shadow on the right is an open shadow which gets lots of reflective light from the left side. But nevertheless has limited detail. With e.g. Delta 100, TMX, Acros, PanF+ or Adox HR-50 you would have got significantly better shadow detail.
And the highlights have almost no detail. Again, with Delta 100, TMX + Co you also would have better highlight detail.
And lower overall contrast = better tonality.
My point is:
My test results with P30 compared to the established films is that P30 cannot compete in quality with the other films. It has no single advantage to them, but some significant disadvantages (like the problematic tonality / density curve, low real sensitivity and much higher price).
Film Ferrania has to convince me as a potential custumer why I should choose P30 instead of the other establishd films. But P30 is not convincing.
I am
not against Ferrania, not at all. I am one of their Kickstarter backers, and I wish them well.
But I want the best quality and best price-performance ratio for my money.
And I currently get that from Ilford, Kodak, Fuji and Adox.
Cheers, Jan