Film SLRs are extremely inexpensive!

Attachments

  • D3S_8821-0600.jpg
    D3S_8821-0600.jpg
    43.4 KB · Views: 0
Dirk said:
Inexpensive film SLRs remind me a little of inexpensive inkjet printers. The initial investment is nothing compared to the expense of using them, especially now that film and developing is getting more and more expensive.
Click to expand...

What a load of BS. :) 4-6$ a roll, developer/chems are very low cost compared to the amount of rolls you get out of them. If you shoot black and white (or even color [including E-6]) you should be doing your own processing. Presuming you use sane storage practices you're gaining free archiving *passively* and a beautiful medium at the same time.
 
Dirk said:
Inexpensive film SLRs remind me a little of inexpensive inkjet printers. The initial investment is nothing compared to the expense of using them, especially now that film and developing is getting more and more expensive.
Click to expand...

And the alternative is to buy a digital camera for lots of money and then watch it become redundant or broken in a few years.

Meanwhile you could process and scan your own film for surprisingly not a lot of money and have fun doing it.

One of the biggest "problems" with film is convenience.
People want everything now. Why would photography be any different? ;)
 
sc_rufctr said:
And the alternative is to buy a digital camera for lots of money and then watch it become redundant or broken in a few years.

Meanwhile you could process and scan your own film for surprisingly not a lot of money and have fun doing it.

One of the biggest "problems" with film is convenience.
People want everything now. Why would photography be any different? ;)
Click to expand...

Anything is expensive compared to free.
A digital camera becoming 'redundant' is a matter of choice, if it's good enough now, why not in the future?
I'm not saying I don't buy modern digital gear, but it's my problem, not digital :)
 
Got a Mamiya ZE-2 - fully working - for £20 (including postage from USA to UK) last summer. Got a Sekor E 28mm f2.8 lens this month for £28 (including postage from Belgium to UK).

Used it last week and it was a joy! Awaiting first roll to come back from the lab.
 
mugent said:
Anything is expensive compared to free.
A digital camera becoming 'redundant' is a matter of choice, if it's good enough now, why not in the future?
I'm not saying I don't buy modern digital gear, but it's my problem, not digital :)
Click to expand...

Don't get me wrong... I love digital. It's a great tool for practice and honing our skills and like I said it's convenient. Also... Pro level full frame digital cameras are getting affordable.
But I love old old film cameras as well. Just load some film and bang away and they can be serviced/repaired.

Try getting a DMR repaired by Leica.
 
Got this for £7

e-thesis+090.jpg
 
snagged a nikon N80 on the 'bay to pair with my F for $25 shipped. a nice clean up + some talc powder on the sticky grip, and it's ready to go.
 
My last camera purchase was a Minolta XG-M body for 99p plus p&p. The seller even lost out on that, he under-quoted. Works fine except the 1/1000th LED never lights up, although the shutter still fires properly. Since my X-700 died, I wanted a body to use the lenses on!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom