It's funny how old threads I missed come to life again. A nice thing in this case.
Reading Magus' original post struck a few notes regarding my experience with the means and ends of photography. My first good camera (toward the tail-end of the second Nixon administration) was a used 35mm RF (Yashica Lynx 5000E...it's true, you "never forget your first"), then, when it broke (for the third time within a year), replaced it with a used Electro GT, then, at the dangerous point where I'd amassed real money, bought a new Canon F-1 and proceeded down the rabbit-hole of SLR technology-chasing. Took a lot of decent pictures, sometimes damned-good ones, but had the vague notion that things were not right, and spending lots of cubic dollars wasn't the answer (I had a long Homer Simpson moment). A little over six years ago, amid numerous wrenching life-changes, I decided, in this case, to go back to the beginning, sort-of: Out went the SLRs (although another SLR came back into my life, from an old friend), inc came the one Hexar RF with one lens, then another, with two more lenses. The "blinkers" as Magus deftly decribes, came off. Not quite a solid-gold-ring-in-my-Cracker-Jack-box revelation, but a big deal for me. Photography is still "not about the gear", but the gear isn't inconsequential. A good camera gets outof the way of your mind's eye. RFs, for me at least, do this better.
- Barrett